Difference between revisions of "User:Rick.mitchell"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
== What Rick's Worked On ==
 
== What Rick's Worked On ==
  
Click here to see [https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/Rick.mitchell Rick's Contributions (Edits)]. [As of Feb. 2010 these mainly deal with the testing guide.]
+
Click here to see [https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/Rick.mitchell Rick's Contributions (Edits)]. [As of Dec. 2009 these mainly deal with the Testing Guide.]
  
To see discussion and contributions with regard to the Common OWASP Numbering project, checkout the mailing list for Jan 2010:<br>
+
To see discussion and contributions with regard to the [[:Common_OWASP_Numbering]] project, checkout the mailing list for Jan 2010:<br>
[https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-testing/2010-January/subject.html OWASP Testing Mailing List Jan 2010]
+
[https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-testing/2010-January/subject.html OWASP Testing Mailing List Jan 2010].
  
 
== "and/or" Explanation ==
 
== "and/or" Explanation ==

Revision as of 07:43, 23 February 2010

Rick's User Page

Contents


What Rick's Worked On

Click here to see Rick's Contributions (Edits). [As of Dec. 2009 these mainly deal with the Testing Guide.]

To see discussion and contributions with regard to the Common_OWASP_Numbering project, checkout the mailing list for Jan 2010:
OWASP Testing Mailing List Jan 2010.

"and/or" Explanation

A quick explanation of why "and/or" shouldn't be used in written English.

Binary logic of "and" and "or"

Note: The OR allows for the same True result as the AND (bottom right corner), while also allowing for other combinations producing True results.
Sometimes people mean "and/exclusive or" when they type "and/or" however this would look extremely strange when written and 99% of the time a simple or will suffice.
Therefore all written usage of "and/or" should simply be "or".