Difference between revisions of "User:Rick.mitchell"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
("and/or" Invalid)
("and/or" Explanation)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
'''Note''': The OR allows for the same True result as the AND (bottom right corner), while also allowing for other combinations producing True results.<br>
 
'''Note''': The OR allows for the same True result as the AND (bottom right corner), while also allowing for other combinations producing True results.<br>
 +
Sometimes people mean "and/exclusive or" when they type "and/or" however this would look extremely strange when written and 99% of the time a simple or will suffice.
 
'''Therefore''' all written usage of "and/or" should simply be "or".
 
'''Therefore''' all written usage of "and/or" should simply be "or".

Revision as of 10:09, 9 June 2008

Rick's User Page

Contents


"and/or" Explanation

A quick explanation of why "and/or" shouldn't be used in written English.

Binary logic of "and" and "or"

Note: The OR allows for the same True result as the AND (bottom right corner), while also allowing for other combinations producing True results.
Sometimes people mean "and/exclusive or" when they type "and/or" however this would look extremely strange when written and 99% of the time a simple or will suffice. Therefore all written usage of "and/or" should simply be "or".