Difference between revisions of "User:Rick.mitchell"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Rick's User Page)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Rick's User Page
 
Rick's User Page
 +
 +
 +
== "and/or" Invalid ==
 +
 +
A quick explanation of why "and/or" shouldn't be used in written English.
 +
 +
[[Image:And_or.png|Binary logic of "and" and "or"]]
 +
 +
'''Note''': The OR allows for the same True result as the AND (bottom right corner), while also allowing for other combinations producing True results.<br>
 +
'''Therefore''' all written usage of "and/or" should simply be "or".

Revision as of 10:00, 9 June 2008

Rick's User Page


"and/or" Invalid

A quick explanation of why "and/or" shouldn't be used in written English.

Binary logic of "and" and "or"

Note: The OR allows for the same True result as the AND (bottom right corner), while also allowing for other combinations producing True results.
Therefore all written usage of "and/or" should simply be "or".