Difference between revisions of "Trust Boundary Violation"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
{{Template:Fortify}}
 
{{Template:Fortify}}
  
[[Category:FIXME|This is the text from the old template. This needs to be rewritten using the new template.]]
+
__TOC__
  
Last revision (mm/dd/yy): '''{{REVISIONMONTH}}/{{REVISIONDAY}}/{{REVISIONYEAR}}'''
+
[[ASDR Table of Contents]]
  
[[ASDR_TOC_Vulnerabilities|Vulnerabilities Table of Contents]]
 
  
[[ASDR Table of Contents]]
+
Last revision (mm/dd/yy): '''{{REVISIONMONTH}}/{{REVISIONDAY}}/{{REVISIONYEAR}}'''
__TOC__
+
 
 +
[[Category:FIXME|This is the text from the old template. This needs to be rewritten using the new template.]]
  
  
Line 106: Line 106:
 
[[Category:Code Snippet]]
 
[[Category:Code Snippet]]
 
[[Category:Design]]
 
[[Category:Design]]
 +
[[Category:Vulnerability]]

Revision as of 08:45, 9 November 2008

This is a Vulnerability. To view all vulnerabilities, please see the Vulnerability Category page.


This article includes content generously donated to OWASP by Fortify.JPG.

Contents


ASDR Table of Contents


Last revision (mm/dd/yy): 11/9/2008


Description

Commingling trusted and untrusted data in the same data structure encourages programmers to mistakenly trust unvalidated data.

A trust boundary can be thought of as line drawn through a program. On one side of the line, data is untrusted. On the other side of the line, data is assumed to be trustworthy. The purpose of validation logic is to allow data to safely cross the trust boundary--to move from untrusted to trusted.

A trust boundary violation occurs when a program blurs the line between what is trusted and what is untrusted. The most common way to make this mistake is to allow trusted and untrusted data to commingle in the same data structure.


Risk Factors

  • Talk about the factors that make this vulnerability likely or unlikely to actually happen
  • Discuss the technical impact of a successful exploit of this vulnerability
  • Consider the likely [business impacts] of a successful attack


Examples

The following Java code accepts an HTTP request and stores the usrname parameter in the HTTP session object before checking to ensure that the user has been authenticated.

  usrname = request.getParameter("usrname");
  if (session.getAttribute(ATTR_USR) == null) {
      session.setAttribute(ATTR_USR, usrname);
  }

Without well-established and maintained trust boundaries, programmers will inevitably lose track of which pieces of data have been validated and which have not. This confusion will eventually allow some data to be used without first being validated.


Related Attacks


Related Vulnerabilities


Related Controls

Related Technical Impacts


References

TBD