Difference between revisions of "Threat Modeling Cheat Sheet"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Identify the Assets within the Target of Evaluation)
 
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
= Steps =
 
= Steps =
  
== Define Asset/Target ==
+
= Define The Target Of Evaluation =
== Motive ==
+
== Create a logical map of the Target of Evaluation ==
== Threat Enumeration ==
+
== Create a physical map of the Target of Evaluation ==
== Application Decomposition ==
+
== Identify the Assets within the physical and logical Targets of Evaluation ==
== Attack Tree ==
+
 
== Vulnerability/Exploit Mapping ==
+
= Define The Attackers =  
== Application Testing ==
+
== Identify Possible Attackers that could exist within the Target Of Evaluation ==
== Remediation/Countermeasures ==
+
* Use Means, Motive, and Opportunity to understand Threats posed by Attackers
 +
* Rank Attackers from least dangerous to most dangerous based on Means, Motive & Opportunity
 +
==Select the most dangerous Attacker in your Target Of Evaluation ==
 +
 
 +
= Conduct the Threat Model =
 +
* Assume the attacker has a zero day, because he does. In this methodology we assume compromise; because a zero day will exist or already does exist (even if we don't know about it). This is about what can be done by skilled attackers, with much more time, money, motive and opportunity than we have.
 +
== Enumerate Threats posed by most dangerous Attacker in Target of Evaluation ==
 +
=== Enumerate Threats posed by most dangerous attacker in designated areas of the physical & logical Maps of the Target of Evaluation ===
 +
* For logical map example: External firewall boundary, Internal firewall boundary, application server, and internal network.
 +
* For physical map example: External to company (wifi attacks from parking lots for example), inside company branch (consultant on local network), in data centre (oops!).
 +
=== Enumerate Attacks posed by most dangerous attacker in designated areas of the logical and physical maps of the target of evaluation ===
 +
 
 +
* Not used in this methodology (compromise is assumed and not demonstrated - just because we can't get in doesn't make it risk free...)
 +
  - Application Decomposition
 +
  - Attack Tree
 +
  - Vulnerability/Exploit Mapping
 +
  - Application Testing
 +
 
 +
== create risks in risk log for every identified threat or attack to any assets ==  
 +
== rank risks using [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_Matrix risk matrix] from most severe to least severe ==  
 +
== Identify risk owners ==
 +
 
 +
= Remediation/Countermeasures =
 +
== Agree on risk mitigation with risk owners and stakeholders ==
 +
* tolerate, transfer, treat, terminate
 +
== Treat risks accordingly ==
 +
== Test risk treatment to verify remediation ==
 +
=== Reduce risk in risk log for verified treated risk ===
 +
=== Periodically retest risk ===
  
 
= Related Articles  =
 
= Related Articles  =

Latest revision as of 18:04, 2 April 2012

Contents

DRAFT CHEAT SHEET - WORK IN PROGRESS

Introduction

Application Security Threat Modeling

Steps

Define The Target Of Evaluation

Create a logical map of the Target of Evaluation

Create a physical map of the Target of Evaluation

Identify the Assets within the physical and logical Targets of Evaluation

Define The Attackers

Identify Possible Attackers that could exist within the Target Of Evaluation

  • Use Means, Motive, and Opportunity to understand Threats posed by Attackers
  • Rank Attackers from least dangerous to most dangerous based on Means, Motive & Opportunity

Select the most dangerous Attacker in your Target Of Evaluation

Conduct the Threat Model

  • Assume the attacker has a zero day, because he does. In this methodology we assume compromise; because a zero day will exist or already does exist (even if we don't know about it). This is about what can be done by skilled attackers, with much more time, money, motive and opportunity than we have.

Enumerate Threats posed by most dangerous Attacker in Target of Evaluation

Enumerate Threats posed by most dangerous attacker in designated areas of the physical & logical Maps of the Target of Evaluation

  • For logical map example: External firewall boundary, Internal firewall boundary, application server, and internal network.
  • For physical map example: External to company (wifi attacks from parking lots for example), inside company branch (consultant on local network), in data centre (oops!).

Enumerate Attacks posed by most dangerous attacker in designated areas of the logical and physical maps of the target of evaluation

  • Not used in this methodology (compromise is assumed and not demonstrated - just because we can't get in doesn't make it risk free...)
 - Application Decomposition
 - Attack Tree
 - Vulnerability/Exploit Mapping
 - Application Testing

create risks in risk log for every identified threat or attack to any assets

rank risks using risk matrix from most severe to least severe

Identify risk owners

Remediation/Countermeasures

Agree on risk mitigation with risk owners and stakeholders

  • tolerate, transfer, treat, terminate

Treat risks accordingly

Test risk treatment to verify remediation

Reduce risk in risk log for verified treated risk

Periodically retest risk

Related Articles

OWASP Cheat Sheets Project Homepage

Developer Cheat Sheets (Builder)

Assessment Cheat Sheets (Breaker)

Mobile Cheat Sheets

OpSec Cheat Sheets (Defender)

Draft Cheat Sheets

Authors and Primary Editors