Difference between revisions of "Testing for Race Conditions (OWASP-AT-010)"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(References)
m (Description of the Issue)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
Account B has 120 credits.<br>
 
Account B has 120 credits.<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 +
 +
Another example can be seen in OWASP's WebGoat project under the Thread Safety lesson and shows how a shopping cart can be manipulated to purchase items for less than their advertised price. This, as with the example above, is due to the data changing between the time of check and its time of use.
  
 
==Black Box testing and example==
 
==Black Box testing and example==

Revision as of 00:10, 24 August 2008

OWASP Testing Guide v3 Table of Contents

This article is part of the OWASP Testing Guide v3. The entire OWASP Testing Guide v3 can be downloaded here.

OWASP at the moment is working at the OWASP Testing Guide v4: you can browse the Guide here

Contents


Brief Summary

A race condition is a flaw that produces an unexpected result when timing of actions impact other actions. An example may be seen on a multithreaded application where actions are being performed on the same data. Race conditions, by their very nature, are difficult to test for.

Description of the Issue

Race conditions may occur when a process is critically or unexpectedly dependent on the sequence or timings of other events. In a web application environment, where multiple requests can be processed at a given time, developers may leave concurrency to be handled by the framework, server or programming language. The following simplified example illustrates a potential concurrency problem in a transactional web application and relates to a joint savings account in which both users (threads) are logged into the same account and attempting a transfer.

Account A has 100 credits.
Account B has 100 credits.

Both User 1 and User 2 want to transfer 10 credits from Account A to Account B. If the transaction was correct the outcome should be:

Account A has 80 credits.
Account B has 120 credits.

However, due to concurrency issues, the following result could be obtained:

User 1 checks the value of Account A (=100 credits)
User 2 checks the value of Account A (=100 credits)
User 2 takes 10 credits from Account A (=90 credits) and put it in Account B (=110 credits)
User 1 takes 10 credits from Account A (Still believed to contain 100 credits) (=90 credits) and puts it into Account B (=120 credits).

Result: Account A has 90 credits.
Account B has 120 credits.

Another example can be seen in OWASP's WebGoat project under the Thread Safety lesson and shows how a shopping cart can be manipulated to purchase items for less than their advertised price. This, as with the example above, is due to the data changing between the time of check and its time of use.

Black Box testing and example

Testing for race conditions is problematic due to their nature, and external influences on testing including server load, network latency etc will all play a part in the presence and detection of the condition.
Attempts to force a race condition may include the ability to make multiple simultaneous requests while observing the outcome for unexpected behavior.

Gray Box testing and example

Code review may reveal likely areas of concern for concurrency issues. More information on reviewing code for concurrency issues can be seen at:
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Reviewing_Code_for_Race_Conditions

References

iSec Partners - Concurrency attacks in Web Applications http://isecpartners.com/files/iSEC%20Partners%20-%20Concurrency%20Attacks%20in%20Web%20Applications.pdf
B. Sullivan and B. Hoffman - Premature Ajax-ulation and You https://www.blackhat.com/presentations/bh-usa-07/Sullivan_and_Hoffman/Whitepaper/bh-usa-07-sullivan_and_hoffman-WP.pdf
Thread Safety Challenge in WebGoat - http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_WebGoat_Project