Testing for Insecure Direct Object References (OTG-AUTHZ-004)
This article is part of the new OWASP Testing Guide v4.
Back to the OWASP Testing Guide v4 ToC: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Testing_Guide_v4_Table_of_Contents Back to the OWASP Testing Guide Project: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Testing_Project
Insecure Direct Object References occur when an application provides direct access to objects based on user-supplied input. As a result of this vulnerability attackers can bypass authorization and access resources in the system directly, for example database records or files.
Description of the Issue
Applications with Insecure Direct Object References allow attackers to bypass authorization and access application resources directly by modifying the value of a parameter used to directly point to an object. Such resources can be database entries belonging to other users, files in the system, and more. This is caused by the fact the application takes user supplied input and uses it to retrieve an object without performing sufficient authorization checks.
Black Box testing and example
To test for this vulnerability the tester needs to first map out all locations in the application where user input is used to reference objects directly. For example – locations where user input is used to access a database row, a file, application pages and more. At the next step the tester should modify the value of the parameter used to reference objects directly and assess whether it is possible to retrieve objects belonging to other users or otherwise bypass authorization. The best way to test for direct object references would be by having at least two (often more) users to cover different owned objects and functionalities. For example two users each having access to different objects (such as purchase information, private messages, etc), and if relevant users with different privileges (for example administrator users) to see whether there are direct references to application functionality. By having multiple users the tester saves valuable testing time in guessing different object names as he can attempt to access with one user objects that belong to the other.
Below are several typical scenarios for this vulnerability and the methods to test for each:
1. The value of a parameter is used directly to retrieve a database record:
sample request: http://foo.bar/somepage?invoice=12345
In this case, the value of the invoice parameter is used as an index in an invoices table in the database. The application takes the value of this parameter and uses it in a query to the database. The application then returns the invoice information to the user.
Since the value of invoice goes directly into the query, by modifying the value of the parameter it is possible to retrieve any invoice object, regardless of the user to whom the invoice belongs. To test for this case the tester should obtain the identifier of an invoice belonging to a different test user (ensuring he is not supposed to view this information per application business logic), and then check whether it is possible to access objects without authorization.
2. The value of a parameter is used directly to perform an operation in the system:
sample request: http://foo.bar/changepassword?user=someuser
in this case, the value of the user parameter is used to tell the application for which user it should change the password. In many cases this step will be a part of a wizard, or a multi-step operation. In the first step the application will get a request stating for which user we are changing the password, and in the next step the user will provide a new password (without asking for the current one). The user parameter is used to directly reference the object of the user for whom the password change operation will be performed. To test for this case the tester should attempt to provide a different test username than the one currently logged in, and check whether it is possible to modify the password of another user.
3. The value of a parameter is used directly to retrieve a file system resource:
In this case, the value of the file parameter is used to tell the application which file the user intends to retrieve. By providing the name or identifier of a different file (for example file=image00012.jpg) the attacker will be able to retrieve objects belonging to other users. To test for this case, the tester should obtain a reference the user is supposed to not be able to access and attempt placing it as the value of file.
[Note: This vulnerability is often exploited in conjunction with a directory/path traversal vulnerability (see Testing for Path Traversal)
4. The value of a parameter is used directly to access application functionality:
sample request: http://foo.bar/accessPage?menuitem=12
In this case, the value of the menuitem parameter is used to tell the application which menu item (and therefore which application functionality) the user is attempting to access. Assume the user is supposed to be restricted and therefore has links available only to access to menu items 1,2 and 3. By modifying the value of menuitem parameter it is possible to bypass authorization and access additional application functionality. To test for this case the tester identifies a location where application functionality is determined by reference to a menu item, maps the values of menu items the given test user can access, and then attempts other menu items.
In the above examples the modification of a single parameter is sufficient. However, sometimes the object reference may be split between more than one parameter, and testing should be adjusted accordingly.