Difference between revisions of "Talk:Trustworthy Java"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(Authors)
(General Discussion)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
==General Discussion==
 
==General Discussion==
  
* The article is built around the claim 'you should use MS Trustworthy in Java'. However, it does not clearly defines what the exact principles of Trustworthy Computing are.
+
* Reference is made to MS's Trustworthy initiative but this is not defined in the article. Could be of benefit to the reader to specifically state the objects of Trustworthy Computing.
* This makes the author of the article sounds more a MS fan that providing real solution. Perhaps technical solutions to the identified problem could prevent this shortcut.
+
* Suggest more specific suggestions on how Java development should change.
 
* Otherwise, the article is agreable to read and well written.
 
* Otherwise, the article is agreable to read and well written.

Revision as of 01:56, 20 November 2006

Contents

Status

Under review

Authors

  • Eric Sheridan

Reviewers

  • Pierre Parrend

General Discussion

  • Reference is made to MS's Trustworthy initiative but this is not defined in the article. Could be of benefit to the reader to specifically state the objects of Trustworthy Computing.
  • Suggest more specific suggestions on how Java development should change.
  • Otherwise, the article is agreable to read and well written.