Difference between revisions of "Talk:OWASP Testing Project v2.0 - Review Guidelines"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Typos'''
 
'''Typos'''
 
----
 
----
 
+
'''12 Jan 2006'''
  
 
Hi all. I ´ ve been having a look at Owasp guide pages and contents, and I
 
Hi all. I ´ ve been having a look at Owasp guide pages and contents, and I
Line 28: Line 28:
 
I send a copy of this message both to wiki discussion page and email to the
 
I send a copy of this message both to wiki discussion page and email to the
 
guide responsibles.
 
guide responsibles.
 +
 +
18-Jan-2006
 +
 +
Dinis Cruz: Thanks for the comments, and you are correct about the dates. Regarding the Typos, if you see one, feel free to correct it

Revision as of 10:12, 18 January 2007

Typos


12 Jan 2006

Hi all. I ´ ve been having a look at Owasp guide pages and contents, and I have doubts because of typos or perhaps not completely well explained facts. In Dinis Cruz first announcement mail you can read:

The current plan is to create a 'published' version of this guide on the 10th of February which will be sent as a book to all OWASP members

But in that same email, the linked page that targets to reviewing guidelines, I found different dates to the email message. At first I read in [http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Testing_Project_v2.0_-_Review_Guidelines#Timelines timelines] section

#  11th January 2007: Review process begins
# 11th January 2007: Review process ends


That I am almost completely secure it is wrong, and so I edited te page to put February the 11th in the reviewing process end. But it keeps mismatching with the time the email says, may you please address this issue? Thank you very much.

I send a copy of this message both to wiki discussion page and email to the guide responsibles.

18-Jan-2006

Dinis Cruz: Thanks for the comments, and you are correct about the dates. Regarding the Typos, if you see one, feel free to correct it