Difference between revisions of "Talk:Getting Started"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: the link to the Fred Brooks'article is no longer available)
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
the link to the Fred Brooks'article is no longer available
+
--- previous comment:the link to the Fred Brooks'article is no longer available 04/Jan/10 Dinis: Is this still valid? The link http://virtualschool.edu/mon/SoftwareEngineering/BrooksNoSilverBullet.html seems to be working --- The email thread i think that one of the early paths of getting involved in OWASP are:
 +
 
 +
*become an editor of the OWASP WIKI website
 +
*review a couple OWASP projects (as per the OWASP Project [[Assessment Criteria v2.0]]<br>
 +
*&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; This is where I would probably contribute the most. I am trying to gather my thoughts on getting details on what a review is, and that type stuff. Here are my thoughts on paper:&nbsp;[http://globalprojectscommittee.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/new-drive-for-project-reviewers/ http://globalprojectscommittee.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/new-drive-for-project-reviewers/]
 +
*point them to the key active projects in roadmap style (Top Ten -&gt; ASVS -&gt; Testing Guide -&gt; Webscarab -&gt; Code Review Guide -&gt; Development Guide -&gt; SAMM -&gt; Webgoat -&gt; ESAPI/AntiSamy)
 +
*contribute graphics?
 +
 
 +
<br>

Latest revision as of 14:51, 5 January 2010

--- previous comment:the link to the Fred Brooks'article is no longer available 04/Jan/10 Dinis: Is this still valid? The link http://virtualschool.edu/mon/SoftwareEngineering/BrooksNoSilverBullet.html seems to be working --- The email thread i think that one of the early paths of getting involved in OWASP are:

  • become an editor of the OWASP WIKI website
  • review a couple OWASP projects (as per the OWASP Project Assessment Criteria v2.0
  •                This is where I would probably contribute the most. I am trying to gather my thoughts on getting details on what a review is, and that type stuff. Here are my thoughts on paper: http://globalprojectscommittee.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/new-drive-for-project-reviewers/
  • point them to the key active projects in roadmap style (Top Ten -> ASVS -> Testing Guide -> Webscarab -> Code Review Guide -> Development Guide -> SAMM -> Webgoat -> ESAPI/AntiSamy)
  • contribute graphics?