Difference between revisions of "Talk:Getting Started"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
04/Jan/10 Dinis: Is this still valid? The link http://virtualschool.edu/mon/SoftwareEngineering/BrooksNoSilverBullet.html seems to be working
 
04/Jan/10 Dinis: Is this still valid? The link http://virtualschool.edu/mon/SoftwareEngineering/BrooksNoSilverBullet.html seems to be working
 
---
 
---
04/Jan/10 Dinis: Jim, you can use this page to put your ideas on what should be on this page. For example, following the email thread i think that one of the early paths of getting involved in OWASP are:
+
The email thread i think that one of the early paths of getting involved in OWASP are:
 
* become an editor of the OWASP WIKI website
 
* become an editor of the OWASP WIKI website
 
* review a couple OWASP projects (as per the OWASP Project [[Assessment Criteria v2.0]]
 
* review a couple OWASP projects (as per the OWASP Project [[Assessment Criteria v2.0]]
* point them to the key active projects in roadmap style (top ten, developers guide, ESAPI, ASVS, etc)
+
* point them to the key active projects in roadmap style (Top Ten -> ASVS -> Testing Guide -> Webscarab -> Code Review Guide -> Development Guide -> SAMM -> Webgoat -> ESAPI/AntiSamy)

Revision as of 14:48, 5 January 2010

--- previous comment:the link to the Fred Brooks'article is no longer available 04/Jan/10 Dinis: Is this still valid? The link http://virtualschool.edu/mon/SoftwareEngineering/BrooksNoSilverBullet.html seems to be working --- The email thread i think that one of the early paths of getting involved in OWASP are:

  • become an editor of the OWASP WIKI website
  • review a couple OWASP projects (as per the OWASP Project Assessment Criteria v2.0
  • point them to the key active projects in roadmap style (Top Ten -> ASVS -> Testing Guide -> Webscarab -> Code Review Guide -> Development Guide -> SAMM -> Webgoat -> ESAPI/AntiSamy)