Security Code Review Coverage
“For every input there will be an equal and opposite output (Well sort of)”
A major part of actually performing a Secure Code inspection is performing a transactional analysis. An application takes inputs and produces output of some kind.
All input to the code needs to be defined. For example, input can come from:
- Browser input (HTTP)
- Other Entity (machines/external processes).
- Property files
Input changes the state of an application. Attackers use input streams to attack applications. Would systems lacking an input mechanism be 100% secure? Probably not.
The input mechanisms, the path the input takes throughout the application, and the output based on the transformed input needs to be documented.
Transactional analysis is of paramount importance when performing code inspection. Any input stream that is overlooked may be a potential door for an attacker.
Transactional analysis includes any cookie or state information passed between the client and server and not just information inputted by the user, the payload.
Take into account any potential errors that can occur in the application for a given input. Are the errors handled properly by the application?
Transactional Analysis includes dynamic and static data flow analysis; where and when variables are set, how the variable are used throughout the workflow, and how attributes of objects and parameters might affect other data within the program. Transactional analysis can help to determine if the parameters, method calls, and data exchange mechanisms implement the required security.
All transactions within the application need to be identified and analyzed along with the relevant security functions they invoke. The areas that are covered during transaction analysis are:
- Cookie Management
- Data/Input Validation from all external sources.
- Error Handling /Information Leakage
- Logging /Auditing
- Cryptography (Data at rest and in transit)
- Secure Code Environment
- Session Management (Login/Logout)
General principles (What to look for)
For each of the areas above a reviewer must look at the following principles in the enforcement of the requirement:
- Ensure all internal and external connections (user and entity) go through an appropriate and adequate form of authentication. Be assured that this control cannot be bypassed.
- Ensure all pages enforce the requirement for authentication.
- Ensure that whenever authentication credentials or any other sensitive information is passed, only accept the information via the HTTP “POST” method and will not accept it via the HTTP “GET” method.
- Any page deemed by the business or the development team as being outside the scope of authentication should be reviewed in order to assess any possibility of security breach.
- Ensure that authentication credentials do not traverse the wire in clear text form.
- Ensure development/debug backdoors are not present in production code.
- Ensure that there are authorization mechanisms in place.
- Ensure that the application has clearly defined the user types and the rights of said users.
- Ensure there is a least privilege stance in operation.
- Ensure that the Authorization mechanisms work properly, fail securely, and cannot be circumvented.
- Ensure that authorization is checked on every request.
- Ensure development/debug backdoors are not present in production code.
- Ensure that sensitive information is not compromised.
- Ensure that unauthorized activities cannot take place via cookie manipulation.
- Ensure that encryption is used properly.
- Ensure secure flag is set to prevent accidental transmission over “the wire” in a non-secure manner.
- Determine if all state transitions in the application code properly check for the cookies and enforce their use.
- Ensure the session data is being validated.
- Ensure cookie contains as little private information as possible.
- Ensure entire cookie should be encrypted if sensitive data is persisted in the cookie.
- Define all cookies being used by the application, their name and why they are needed.
- Ensure that a DV mechanism is present.
- Ensure all input that can (and will) be modified by a malicious user such as http headers, input fields, hidden fields, drop down lists & other web components are properly validated.
- Ensure that the proper length checks on all input exist.
- Ensure that all fields, cookies, http headers/bodies & form fields are validated.
- Ensure that the data is well formed and contains only known good chars is possible.
- Ensure that the data validation occurs on the server side.
- Examine where data validation occurs and if a centralized model or decentralized model is used.
- Ensure there are no backdoors in the data validation model.
- Golden Rule: All external input, no matter what it is, is examined and validated.
Error Handling/Information leakage:
- Ensure that all method/function calls that return a value have proper error handling and return value checking.
- Ensure that exceptions and error conditions are properly handled.
- Ensure that no system errors can be returned to the user.
- Ensure that the application fails in a secure manner.
- Ensure resources are released if an error occurs.
- Ensure that no sensitive information is logged in the event of an error.
- Ensure the payload being logged is of a defined maximum length and that the logging mechanism enforces that length.
- Ensure no sensitive data can be logged; E.g. cookies, HTTP “GET” method, authentication credentials.
- Examine if the application will audit the actions being taken by the application on behalf of the client particularly and data manipulation/Create, Update, Delete (CUD) operations.
- Ensure successful & unsuccessful authentication is logged.
- Ensure application errors are logged.
- Examine the application for debug logging with the view to logging of sensitive data.
- Ensure no sensitive data is transmitted in the clear, internally or externally.
- Ensure the application is implementing known good cryptographic algorithms.
Secure Code Environment:
- Examine the file structure, are any components that should not be directly accessible available to the user.
- Examine all memory allocations/de-allocations.
- Examine the application for dynamic SQL and determine is vulnerable to injection.
- Examine the application for “main()” executable functions and debug harnesses/backdoors
- Search for commented out code, commented out test code, which may contain sensitive information.
- Ensure all logical decisions have a default clause.
- Ensure no development environment kit is contained on the build directories.
- Search for any calls to the underlying operating system or file open calls and examine the error possibilities.
- Examine how and when a session is created for a user, unauthenticated and authenticated.
- Examine the session ID and verify is a complex enough to fulfill requirements regarding strength.
- Examine how sessions are stored: E.g. In a database, in memory etc.
- Examine how the application tracks sessions.
- Determine the actions the application takes if an invalid session ID occurs.
- Examine session invalidation.
- Determine how multithreaded/multi-user session management is performed.
- Determine the session HTTP inactivity timeout.
- Determine how the log-out functionality functions.
Understand what you are reviewing:
Many modern applications are developed on frameworks. These frameworks provide the developer less work to do as the framework does much of the “House Keeping”. So the objects developed by the development team shall extend the functionality of the framework. It is here that the knowledge of a given framework and language which the framework and application is implemented in is of paramount importance. Much of the transactional functionality may not be visible in the developers code and handled in “Parent” classes.
The analyst must be aware and knowledgeable of the underlying framework
In struts the struts-config.xml and the web.xml files are the core points to view the transactional functionality of an application.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?> <!DOCTYPE struts-config PUBLIC "-//Apache Software Foundation//DTD Struts Configuration 1.0//EN" "http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/dtds/struts-config_1_0.dtd"> <struts-config> <form-beans> <form-bean name="login" type="test.struts.LoginForm" /> </form-beans> <global-forwards> </global-forwards> <action-mappings> <action path="/login" type="test.struts.LoginAction" >
<forward name="valid" path="/jsp/MainMenu.jsp" /> <forward name="invalid" path="/jsp/LoginView.jsp" /> </action>
</action-mappings> <plug-in className="org.apache.struts.validator.ValidatorPlugIn"> <set-property property="pathnames" value="/test/WEB-INF/validator-rules.xml, /WEB-INF/validation.xml"/> </plug-in> </struts-config>
The struts-config.xml file contains the action mappings for each HTTP request while the web.xml file contains the deployment descriptor.
Example: The struts framework has a validator engine, which relies on regular expressions to validate the input data. The beauty of the validator is that no code has to be written for each form bean. (Form bean is the java object which received the data from the HTTP request) . The validator is not enabled by default in struts. To enable the validator a plug-in must be defined in the <plug-in> section of struts-config.xml in Red above. The property defined tells the struts framework where the custom validation rules are defined (validation.xml) and a definition of the actual rules themselves (validation-rules.xml).
Without a proper understanding of the struts framework and by simply auditing the Java code one would not see any validation being executed and one does not see the relationship between the defined rules and the java functions.
The action mappings in Blue define the action taken by the application upon receiving a request. Here, above we can see that when the URL contains /login the LoginAction shall be called. From the action mappings we can see the transactions the application performs when external input is received.
ASP.NET/ IIS applications use an optional XML-based configuration file named web.config, to maintain application configuration settings. This covers issues such as authentication, authorisation, Error pages, HTTP settings, debug settings, web service settings etc..
Without knowledge of these files a transactional analysis would be very difficult and not accurate.
Optionally, you may provide a file web.config at the root of the virtual directory for a Web application. If the file is absent, the default configuration settings in machine.config will be used. If the file is present, any settings in web.config will override the default settings.
Example of the web.config file:
<authentication mode="Forms"> <forms name="name" loginUrl="url" protection="Encryption" timeout="30" path="/" > requireSSL="true|" slidingExpiration="false"> <credentials passwordFormat="Clear"> <user name="username" password="password"/> </credentials> </forms> <passport redirectUrl="internal"/> </authentication>
OK so from this config file snippet we can see that:
authentication mode: The default authentication mode is ASP.NET forms-based authentication.
loginUrl: Specifies the URL where the request is redirected for logon if no valid authentication cookie is found.
protection: Sepcifies that the cookie is encrypted using 3DES or DES but DV is not performed on the cookie. Beware of plaintext attacks!!
timeout: Cookie expiry time in minutes
The point to make here is that many of the important security settings are not set in the code per se but in the framework configuration files. Knowledge of the framework is of paramount importance when reviewing framework-based applications.