Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Teachable Static Analysis Workbench - Final Review - Self Evaluation - B"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Clik here to return to the previous page. {| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" ! colspan="3" align="center...)
 
 
Line 17: Line 17:
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#Teachable Static Analysis Workbench|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
 
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#Teachable Static Analysis Workbench|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| What is not done: access control vulnerabilities are not supported. There is a vision how to do it in next release.
 
  |-
 
  |-
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#Teachable Static Analysis Workbench|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage.
 
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#Teachable Static Analysis Workbench|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage.
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|Project 100% Beta: it enables static analysis of Servlet and JSP-based web applications to search for input validation vulnerabilities. Documentation and Technical report created. Presentation is scheduled to OWASP EU Summit 2008, Portugal
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?
 
3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| Perform 100% review
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II'''  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II'''  
Line 40: Line 40:
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status?
 
1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| All done
 
  |-
 
  |-
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status?
 
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| Add a common About Box
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status?
 
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|One-click build, Fortify Software's open source review  and FindBugs
 
  |-   
 
  |-   
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|

Latest revision as of 10:36, 27 October 2008

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I

Project Deliveries & Objectives

OWASP Teachable Static Analysis Workbench Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

What is not done: access control vulnerabilities are not supported. There is a vision how to do it in next release.

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

Project 100% Beta: it enables static analysis of Servlet and JSP-based web applications to search for input validation vulnerabilities. Documentation and Technical report created. Presentation is scheduled to OWASP EU Summit 2008, Portugal

3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?

Perform 100% review
PART II

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

All done

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

Add a common About Box

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

One-click build, Fortify Software's open source review and FindBugs

4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?