Project Information:template SKAVENGER - Final Review - Self Evaluation - B

From OWASP
Revision as of 11:54, 10 February 2009 by Mrohr (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I

Project Deliveries & Objectives

Skavenger Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

The following "Ideas" have been accomblished:
A GUI to monitor and analyze scanning results More sophisticated scanner modules (e.g. for better backend identification and more platform specific tests).
The gui component was realized much more sophisticatedly then planed. Which is why other "ideas" like a plugin for WebScarab or direct database integration where not realized in this realease.

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

100%

3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?

PART II

More testing. Ideas for more compley (stateful) modules

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?


None

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?


None
---------
All planed tasks for beta status have been fulfilled:

  • GUI: Finished and has been well tested
  • Modules: All in all 12 sophisticated and highly configurable modules
  • All known bugs have been fixed

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?