Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Orizon Project - Final Review - Self Evaluation - B"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Clik here to return to the previous page. {| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" ! colspan="3" align="center" style="background:#...)
 
Line 18: Line 18:
 
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#The Owasp Orizon Project|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
 
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#The Owasp Orizon Project|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
  |-
+
The main goal of the Owasp Orizon project is to provide a set of APIs and a security check library to let people who want to write a static analyzer to use it as engine. In this perspective the goal has completely accomplished.
 +
The second and minor goal is to provide an embedded tool that uses Orizon APIs. Considering this, a lot of work needs to be done in having a release quality project.
 +
 
 +
In fact the goals that were not reached are:
 +
* having all Owasp Code Review Guide security checks in the embedded library
 +
* having the embedded tool a more usable GUI
 +
* having a binary package for Win32 and UNIX/Linux architectures (Mac OS X Application is available at sourceforge). 
 +
|-
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#The Owasp Orizon Project|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage.
 
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#The Owasp Orizon Project|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage.

Revision as of 11:59, 12 November 2008

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I

Project Deliveries & Objectives

OWASP Orizon Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

The main goal of the Owasp Orizon project is to provide a set of APIs and a security check library to let people who want to write a static analyzer to use it as engine. In this perspective the goal has completely accomplished. The second and minor goal is to provide an embedded tool that uses Orizon APIs. Considering this, a lot of work needs to be done in having a release quality project.

In fact the goals that were not reached are:

  • having all Owasp Code Review Guide security checks in the embedded library
  • having the embedded tool a more usable GUI
  • having a binary package for Win32 and UNIX/Linux architectures (Mac OS X Application is available at sourceforge).

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?

PART II

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?