Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Enigform and mod OpenPGP - Final Review - First Reviewer - D"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Clik here to return to the previous page. {| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" ! colspan="3" align="center" style="ba...)
 
Line 17: Line 17:
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#OpenPGP Extensions for HTTP - Enigform and mod_openpgp|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
 
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#OpenPGP Extensions for HTTP - Enigform and mod_openpgp|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|I confirmed that Enigform works with Wordpress.  I was able to install the Enigform extension from Mozilla.  I tested the server side key import with several PGP keys.  I am satisfied with the copious documentation.  I have tested each feature and worked with Arturo to resolve any issue and reach completion.
  |-
+
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#OpenPGP Extensions for HTTP - Enigform and mod_openpgp|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage.
 
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#OpenPGP Extensions for HTTP - Enigform and mod_openpgp|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage.
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|100%
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.
 
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|I'd like to see the project extended to develop additional server side modules and additional Enigform client tools.  If it is possible to push to an open source code repo, and start outlining how to develop additional tools, that would be invaluable. However, I do not consider that necessary for completion.
 +
 
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II'''  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II'''  
Line 40: Line 41:
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status?
 
1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|Arturo needs to implement a better way to make the code available at Googlecode or Sourceforge.  I would like to see documentation in OWASP updated for the project, including a roadmap of future deliveries.
 
  |-
 
  |-
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status?
 
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|Server side GUI may not be feasible or needed.  Client side GUI is basically the Options for the Enigform extension.
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status?
 
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|N/A
 
  |-   
 
  |-   
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.
 
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|Move more of the documentation and code to googlecode or sourceforge.  Documentation for developing other server application modules, other enigform clients would be useful, if not already in progress by Arturo.
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 22:16, 16 March 2009

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I

Project Deliveries & Objectives

OWASP OpenPGP Extensions for HTTP - Enigform and mod_openpgp Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

I confirmed that Enigform works with Wordpress. I was able to install the Enigform extension from Mozilla. I tested the server side key import with several PGP keys. I am satisfied with the copious documentation. I have tested each feature and worked with Arturo to resolve any issue and reach completion.

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

100%

3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

I'd like to see the project extended to develop additional server side modules and additional Enigform client tools. If it is possible to push to an open source code repo, and start outlining how to develop additional tools, that would be invaluable. However, I do not consider that necessary for completion.
PART II

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

Arturo needs to implement a better way to make the code available at Googlecode or Sourceforge. I would like to see documentation in OWASP updated for the project, including a roadmap of future deliveries.

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

Server side GUI may not be feasible or needed. Client side GUI is basically the Options for the Enigform extension.

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

N/A

4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

Move more of the documentation and code to googlecode or sourceforge. Documentation for developing other server application modules, other enigform clients would be useful, if not already in progress by Arturo.