Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template EnDe - First Review - Self Evaluation - A"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(inital inquiery completed)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Project Information:template Open Review Project|Clik here to return to the previous page]].
 
 
 
{| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center"
 
{| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center"
 
  ! colspan="3" align="center" style="background:#4058A0; color:white"|<font color="white">'''FINAL REVIEW'''  
 
  ! colspan="3" align="center" style="background:#4058A0; color:white"|<font color="white">'''FINAL REVIEW'''  
Line 23: Line 21:
 
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[:Category:OWASP EnDe RoadMap|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage.
 
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[:Category:OWASP EnDe RoadMap|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage.
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
As the above listed encryption functions are more difficult to implement than those already there, I'd calculate the project at 75%.
+
As the above listed encryption functions are more difficult to implement than those already there, I'd calculate the project at 75%.<br>
 +
Integration with other tools - 0%
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
Line 49: Line 48:
 
1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status?
 
1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status?
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 +
* (Agree to OWASP's open source license): ''pending'', currently GPL2 will probably become CC-x.x
 +
* (The “main” page for any OWASP tool must be on the OWASP website)
 +
** (describe the tool, the project leader, contact info, and include all relevant links, including a download link for the code and the executable version): tool: [[Category:OWASP_EnDe]]<br>[[:User:Achim| project leader]]<br>[[:Category:OWASP_EnDe| contact]]<br>[http://ende.my-stp.net/EnDe.man.html EnDe Documentation, links, etc.]<br>[http://ende.my-stp.net/EnDe.tgz Download] ''there is no executable version as it's all HTML and JavaScript, the download is the code itself''.
 +
** (includes a roadmap/guideline pointing out the steps to achieve the purpose of project) [[:Category:OWASP EnDe RoadMap| EnDe RoadMap]]
 +
** (include the Alpha Quality Tool project tag. (Which we still need to define)) ''??''
 +
** (be placed at OWASP Project page) [[:Category:OWASP_Project |OWASP Projects:  Alpha Status Projects]]
 +
* (Have its code and any documentation in Googlecode, or Sourceforge) ''pending''
 +
* (Mailing list for project created) ''done''
 +
* (Solves a core application security need) help developers and testers to understand various coudings
 
  |-
 
  |-
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  

Latest revision as of 12:43, 19 October 2009

FINAL REVIEW
PART I

Project Deliveries & Objectives

EnDe Project RoadMap & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

The current version is stable (beside some known browser GUI quirks). There're improvements planed like adding more hashing, coding and encryption functions, see EnDe RoadMap for details. This new functionality should be considered as enhancement request.

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

As the above listed encryption functions are more difficult to implement than those already there, I'd calculate the project at 75%.
Integration with other tools - 0%

3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?

1. Reviewer

  • anything to be found at the OWASP wiki
  • the documentation, see [?] button in the GUI and EnDe.man.txt

2. Community

  • initial code for the missing features (see EnDe RoadMap)
  • testing and reporting bugs and enhancement requests
PART II

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

  • (Agree to OWASP's open source license): pending, currently GPL2 will probably become CC-x.x
  • (The “main” page for any OWASP tool must be on the OWASP website)
    • (describe the tool, the project leader, contact info, and include all relevant links, including a download link for the code and the executable version): tool:
      project leader
      contact
      EnDe Documentation, links, etc.
      Download there is no executable version as it's all HTML and JavaScript, the download is the code itself.
    • (includes a roadmap/guideline pointing out the steps to achieve the purpose of project) EnDe RoadMap
    • (include the Alpha Quality Tool project tag. (Which we still need to define)) ??
    • (be placed at OWASP Project page) OWASP Projects: Alpha Status Projects
  • (Have its code and any documentation in Googlecode, or Sourceforge) pending
  • (Mailing list for project created) done
  • (Solves a core application security need) help developers and testers to understand various coudings

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?