Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Code Crawler - Final Review - Self Evaluation - B"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 52: Line 52:
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?
 
4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| Database improvements (it's the database setup that makes different in Code Crawler), Feedbacks.
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| Database improvements (it's the database setup that makes the difference. The more accure and detailed descriptions, the more usefull it is), Feedbacks.
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 10:52, 16 March 2009

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I

Project Deliveries & Objectives

CodeCrawler's Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

The application is easy to use and setup.

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

Stable (100%)

3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?

Would be helpful to have the community to work on improving the database of Code Crawler. Doing so will improve the accuracy of the engine and consequently the value of the tool
PART II

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

None

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

None

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

No installation package, Not much documentation. (I'm working on these aspects and plan to do release them very soon).

4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?

Database improvements (it's the database setup that makes the difference. The more accure and detailed descriptions, the more usefull it is), Feedbacks.