Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template .NET Project - Final Review - OWASP Board Member - G"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Clik here to return to the previous page. {| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" ! colspan="3" align="center" style="background:#40...)
 
 
Line 48: Line 48:
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status?
 
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|"In June 1, 2009, when asked through a Google chat about .NET Project's review, Dinis, the Board's Member Reviewer, agreed the project should be paid without more delays." Paulo Coimbra, OWASP Project Manager. 
 
  |-   
 
  |-   
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|

Latest revision as of 05:38, 2 June 2009

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I

Project Deliveries & Objectives

OWASP .NET Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

PART II

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

"In June 1, 2009, when asked through a Google chat about .NET Project's review, Dinis, the Board's Member Reviewer, agreed the project should be paid without more delays." Paulo Coimbra, OWASP Project Manager.

4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.