Project Information: Live CD 2008 Project - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F

De OWASP
Saltar a: navegación, buscar

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I


Project Deliveries & Objectives

OWASP Live CD 2008 Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

Project objective was to review the functionality of previous OWASP LiveCD's, install updated tools, and add complementary tools to broaden the scope of the offering. 100% completed.

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

100% complete per proposed deliverables.

3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

This reviewer believes that OWASP needs to take steps to distinguish LiveCD SOC 2008 and other versions of the OWASP LiveCD. Please google "OWASP LiveCD" - if there is any doubt about the potential for confusion. OWASP LiveCD contributors should please CLEARLY LABEL their OWASP LiveCD initiatives, such as "OWASP LiveCD SOC 2008, or OWASP LiveCD SOC 2006". There will likely be an "OWASP LiveCD SOC 2009". Absolutely the contributions are welcome, but let's try to avoid confusing our users !

PART II

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

See comments, section 3

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

See comments, section 3

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

Criteria assessed: Ease of Use [straightforward]; Online Documentation [has been provided]; Build Instructions [have been provided]; Bug Tracking [provided]; Code Repository at Google Code [provided]; Release Notes [have been provided]; overall 100% complete; 100% compliant with OWASP Project Assessment Methology

4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

Please see comments in section 4, above. A more-detailed OWASP LiveCD distro identification scheme is needed, and it needs to be back-ported to any work referred to as ("googable as") "OWASP LiveCD".