Difference between revisions of "Project Information:Sqlibench - Final Review - Self Evaluation - B"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Clik here to return to the previous page. {| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" ! colspan="3" align="center" style="background:#4058A0; col...)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
 
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#SQL_Injector_Benchmarking_Project_.28SQLiBENCH.29|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
 
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#SQL_Injector_Benchmarking_Project_.28SQLiBENCH.29|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 +
 +
%90 of the overall deliverables are finished. The three unfinished jobs we have are; creating videos of the preparing the environment (nevertheless written documentation has been produced), integrating the vulnerable application into OWASP Site Generator, (we won't pursue this) and lastly, writing webscarab-beanshell scripts for exploitation (instead we have created a howto document explaining the testing methodology for other benchmarkers, inclusing example runs of sqlmap)
 +
 +
Additional to the %50 review deliverables, here are other deliverables adding upto the %100 review;
 +
 +
1. xml benchmarking report (http://sqlibench.googlecode.com/files/sqlibench_v2.1.xml)
 +
 +
2. tabular pdf benchmarking report (http://sqlibench.googlecode.com/files/sqlibench_matrix_v2.pdf).
 +
 +
3. updated interactive web application (http://www.webguvenligi.org/sqlibench/web/index.php)
 +
 +
4. benchmarker life saver document (http://code.google.com/p/sqlibench/wiki/HowToBenchmark)
 +
 
  |-
 
  |-
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  

Revision as of 04:37, 28 September 2008

.

50% REVIEW PROCESS

Project Deliveries & Objectives

Sqlibench Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

%90 of the overall deliverables are finished. The three unfinished jobs we have are; creating videos of the preparing the environment (nevertheless written documentation has been produced), integrating the vulnerable application into OWASP Site Generator, (we won't pursue this) and lastly, writing webscarab-beanshell scripts for exploitation (instead we have created a howto document explaining the testing methodology for other benchmarkers, inclusing example runs of sqlmap)

Additional to the %50 review deliverables, here are other deliverables adding upto the %100 review;

1. xml benchmarking report (http://sqlibench.googlecode.com/files/sqlibench_v2.1.xml)

2. tabular pdf benchmarking report (http://sqlibench.googlecode.com/files/sqlibench_matrix_v2.pdf).

3. updated interactive web application (http://www.webguvenligi.org/sqlibench/web/index.php)

4. benchmarker life saver document (http://code.google.com/p/sqlibench/wiki/HowToBenchmark)

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?

PART II

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?