Difference between revisions of "Polls"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(moved statement poll to closed polls)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
== ''' Current Poll(s)''' ==
 
== ''' Current Poll(s)''' ==
* ''' [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/forms/d/18kngpGOR4-ySYCZ-74zAgjyE2elpPp2Gg780mtbZDu0/viewform Do you support OWASP to make the following public statement to the effect that subverting/weakening crypto is a bad idea?] '''
+
 
The text of the statement is here: [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/document/d/1wy7EsxQu03eRMAjWW7pXXr9GKpW_O-eJuOlQKbsnMbE/edit?usp=sharing ]
+
** Yes, we shall release it
+
** No, we shall not release it
+
* Date started: 2014 Jan 23
+
* Proposed close date: Jan 27 14:00 CST
+
* Author: [[User:tgondrom |Tobias Gondrom]]
+
  
  
Line 97: Line 91:
 
* Date closed: 2014 Jan 15
 
* Date closed: 2014 Jan 15
 
* Author: [[User:Simon Bennetts|Simon Bennetts]]
 
* Author: [[User:Simon Bennetts|Simon Bennetts]]
 +
 +
 +
* '''Do you support OWASP to make the following public statement to the effect that subverting/weakening crypto is a bad idea?'''
 +
The text of the statement is here: [http://owasp.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/owasp-statement-on-security-of-internet.html]
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|-
 +
! Should OWASP give a developer training cource at the 2014 RSA conference?
 +
! # votes
 +
! %
 +
|-
 +
| Yes, we shall release it
 +
| 30
 +
| 100%
 +
|-
 +
| No, we shall not release it
 +
| 0
 +
| 0%
 +
|}
 +
* [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/forms/d/18kngpGOR4-ySYCZ-74zAgjyE2elpPp2Gg780mtbZDu0/viewanalytics Full results]
 +
* Date started: 2014 Jan 23
 +
* Proposed close date: Jan 27 14:00 CST
 +
* Author: [[User:tgondrom |Tobias Gondrom]]

Revision as of 14:23, 23 February 2014

OWASP Polls are a way of getting the 'pulse' of the OWASP community - they should not be considered 'binding'.

They may be about any subject that people feel may be of interest to the OWASP community.

All polls require an Owasp.org email_address and will publish full details of the responses.

If you ask for the form to be shared with you from a non OWASP address then you will just get a canned response explaining why this will not currently happen.

To add a poll please contact Simon Bennetts

Current Poll(s)

Note that only OWASP members can see the 'live' results and the statement before its release. A summary of the results will be made public when the poll closes, but the full details will stay restricted to OWASP members to prevent email harvesting.


Past polls

  • Is it acceptable for organizations to place restrictions on OWASP presenting any material at any other events?
  • Final results
Should OWASP give a developer training cource at the 2014 RSA conference? # votes  %
Yes, commercial organizations make these decisions to protect and add value to their events, if we want to present at them we should abide by their rules 0 0%
Yes, as above, but only under exceptional circumstances and it should require an OWASP board vote 3 10%
No, we should never accept any such restrictions 27 87%
Other 1 3%


  • Should OWASP give developer training at RSA?
Should OWASP give a developer training cource at the 2014 RSA conference? # votes  %
Yes, this should be an official OWASP initiative 31 43%
No, OWASP should publicly pull out 25 35%
Yes, as long as the training is given as individuals an not an official OWASP initiative 8 11%
The board should decide 7 10%
Other 1 1%
Should OWASP make a public statement to the effect that subverting/weakening crypto is a bad idea # votes  %
Yes 67 93%
No 5 7%


  • Do you support OWASP to make the following public statement to the effect that subverting/weakening crypto is a bad idea?

The text of the statement is here: [1]

Should OWASP give a developer training cource at the 2014 RSA conference? # votes  %
Yes, we shall release it 30 100%
No, we shall not release it 0 0%