Difference between revisions of "OWASP Code Review Guide Table of Contents"

Jump to: navigation, search
(Example reports)
Line 86: Line 86:
==[[Automating Code Reviews]]==
==[[Automating Code Reviews]]==
#[[Preface ]]
#[[Preface ]]
#[[Reasons for using automated tools]]
#[[Reasons for Using Code Review Tools]]
#[[Education and cultural change]]
#[[Education and cultural change]]
#[[Tool Deployment Model]]
#[[Tool Deployment Model]]

Revision as of 16:41, 15 January 2009

Foreword by OWASP Chair

1. Frontispiece

1.1 About the OWASP Code Review Project

1.2 About The Open Web Application Security Project

Guide History

Code Review Guide History


Crawling Code

  1. Crawling Code
  2. Searching for Code in J2EE/Java
  3. Searching for Code in Classic ASP
  4. JavaScript/Web 2.0 Keywords and Pointers

Code Reviews and PCI DSS

  1. Code Reviews and compliance

Examples by technical control

  1. Authentication
  2. Authorization
  3. Session Management
  4. Input Validation
  5. Error Handling
  6. Secure Deployment
  7. Cryptographic controls

Examples by vulnerability

  1. Reviewing Code for Buffer Overruns and Overflows
  2. Reviewing Code for OS Injection
  3. Reviewing Code for SQL Injection
  4. Reviewing Code for Data Validation
  5. Reviewing Code for Cross-site scripting
  6. Reviewing code for Cross-Site Request Forgery issues
  7. Reviewing Code for Logging Issues
  8. Reviewing Code for Session Integrity issues
  9. Reviewing Code for Race Conditions

Language specific best practice


Classic ASP




Rich Internet Applications

Example reports

  1. How to Write an Application Code Review Finding

Automating Code Reviews

  1. Preface
  2. Reasons for Using Code Review Tools
  3. Education and cultural change
  4. Tool Deployment Model
  5. Code Auditor Workbench Tool
  6. The Owasp Orizon Framework

The Owasp Code Review Top 10 flaw categories

The Owasp Code Review Scoring System