Difference between revisions of "OWASP Autumn of Code 2006 - Selection"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Jury: These results have analysed and classified by Andrew van der Stock, Jeff Williams and Dinis Cruz.
 
Jury: These results have analysed and classified by Andrew van der Stock, Jeff Williams and Dinis Cruz.
 
  
 
== Selection Criteria ==
 
== Selection Criteria ==
Line 9: Line 8:
  
 
* On the Project:  
 
* On the Project:  
** Final Completeness State
+
** Complete status - What will be the final Completeness State?
** Project Complexity and Size of Project
+
** Complexity - What is the project Complexity and its Size  
** Value to Owasp Members
+
** Member Value - How big is the potential added value to Owasp Members
** Value to Owasp Brand
+
** Brand Value - How big is the potential added value to the Owasp Brand
 
* On the Candidate:
 
* On the Candidate:
** Value of past Project contributions
+
** Past Work -  Value of past contributions to OWASP Projects
** Proven capability to deliver
+
** Deliverably -  Proven capability to deliver
** Quality of Proposal
+
** Proposal - What was the quality of proposal submited?
 +
 
 +
== Classication of Proposals ==
 +
 
 +
{| border="1"
 +
|+ OWASP Autumn of Code 2006 Results
 +
|-
 +
|Proposal || Andrew v. Stock|| Jeff Williams  || Dinis Cruz || .. || Total
 +
|-
 +
|Proposal || Complete State || Complexity || Member Value || Brand Value || Past Work || Deliverably || Proposal || .. || Total
 +
|-
 +
 
 +
| 1 AoC 1 - Paolo  || 0 || 0 || 0 || .. || 0
 +
|-
 +
| 2 AoC 2 - Federico || 0 || 0 || 0 || .. || 0
 +
|-
 +
| 3 AoC 3 - Tom  || 0 || 0 || 0 || .. || 0
 +
|}

Revision as of 18:54, 21 September 2006

This page contains the Selection Criteria used to select the projects sponsored on the OWASP Autumn of Code 2006 and the final classification.

Jury: These results have analysed and classified by Andrew van der Stock, Jeff Williams and Dinis Cruz.

Selection Criteria

Each project will receive a rating from 1 to 5 on the following categories by each jury. The final result will be the medium value.

  • On the Project:
    • Complete status - What will be the final Completeness State?
    • Complexity - What is the project Complexity and its Size
    • Member Value - How big is the potential added value to Owasp Members
    • Brand Value - How big is the potential added value to the Owasp Brand
  • On the Candidate:
    • Past Work - Value of past contributions to OWASP Projects
    • Deliverably - Proven capability to deliver
    • Proposal - What was the quality of proposal submited?

Classication of Proposals

OWASP Autumn of Code 2006 Results
Proposal Andrew v. Stock Jeff Williams Dinis Cruz .. Total
Proposal Complete State Complexity Member Value Brand Value Past Work Deliverably Proposal .. Total
1 AoC 1 - Paolo 0 0 0 .. 0
2 AoC 2 - Federico 0 0 0 .. 0
3 AoC 3 - Tom 0 0 0 .. 0