- 1 Guidelines
- 2 Project Requests
- 2.1 P001 - OWASP Open Threat Modeling Process
- 2.2 P006 - OWASP Corporate Application Security Rating Guide
- 2.3 P007 - OWASP Security Facts Label
- 2.4 P008 - OWASP Security Test Automation
- 2.5 P009 - OWASP Security Unit Test Framework
- 2.6 P010 - OWASP Client-Side Browser Fingerprint Project
- 2.7 P011 - OWASP CLASP Refresh
- 2.8 P014 - OWASP Security Refactoring Tool Project
- 2.9 P015 - OWASP BlackTop - Runtime Coverage Analysis Tool
- 2.10 P016 - OWASP .NET Access Control Tool
- 2.11 P019 - OWASP ColdFusion Security Project
- 2.12 P020 - OWASP JUnit Static Analysis Integration Project
- 2.13 P021 - OWASP Server Side Security Scanner
- 2.14 P023 - OWASP Code Review Tree
- 2.15 P024 - OWASP Attack Surface Metric
- 2.16 P026 - OWASP Java Sandbox Policy Tool
Information for Students
The ideas below were contributed by OWASP project leaders and users. They are sometimes vague or incomplete. If you wish to submit a proposal based on these ideas, you may wish to contact the project leaders and find out more about the particular suggestion you're looking at. Being accepted as a Google Summer of Code student is quite competitive. Accepted students typically have thoroughly researched the technologies of their proposed project and have been in frequent contact with potential mentors. Simply copying and pasting an idea here will not work. On the other hand, creating a completely new idea without first consulting potential mentors is unlikely to work out.
Adding a Proposal
Project: Brief explanation: Expected results: Knowledge Prerequisite: Mentor: When adding an idea to this section, please try to include the following data: if the application is not widely known, a description of what it does and where its code lives a brief explanation the expected results pre-requisites for working on your project if applicable, links to more information or discussions mailing list or IRC channel for your application/library/module your name and email address for contact (if you're willing to be a mentor) If you are not a developer but have a good idea for a proposal, get in contact with relevant developers first. Ideas How to find ideas? To see previous Project ideas, see: 2010 ideas. Obvious sources of projects are the bugs database, the forum, and your list and IRC channel ideas.
Generic Sample Proposal
- Accepted for GSoC 2011 ***
Brief explanation: KDE has developed a number of very interesting and powerful technologies, libraries and components but there is no easy way to show them to other people. See "A wish a day: KDE Demo" for more details. Expected results: Something like Qt Demo but with KDE technologies. Knowledge prerequisite: C++ is the main language of KDE, therefore the demo should be in C++. The more you know about C++, Qt, KDE and scripting (for Kross and KDE bindings demos), the better. This idea encompasses so much different stuff the student is not expected to know everything before he starts coding (but will certainly know a lot when he's done!). Skill level: medium Mentor: Pau Garcia i Quiles as general mentor and someone to ask for directions. Specific help for each technology will probably require help from its developers.
P001 - OWASP Open Threat Modeling Process
- Project description: Document a methodology for threat modeling that is simple, consistent, and reproduceable. The documentation should make it possible for a developer to create a threat model and begin to identify risks. The threat model should produced should include the security relevant details of the application architecture, the threat agents, attack vectors, vulnerabilities, security controls, technical impacts and business impacts. All the common security areas should be represented across identity and authentication, session management, access control, input validation, encoding and canonicalization, error handling, logging and intrusion detection, availability, integrity, concurrency, etc...
- While some level of expertise in application security is required to identify risks, the approach should allow anyone to gather all the relevant information, organize it, and prepare for an expert's participation.
- The result should include several 'standard' threat models for common scenarios that users can start with, such as internet facing multi-user web application, internal client-server application, etc.
- The approach should make it possible for risks to be identified by starting with threat agents (Microsoft approach), or by starting from business impacts and working backwards (threat/attack trees). The approach should also allow for a security controls oriented approach (like NIST 800-53).
- The project could (as an option) include an open threat modeling tool like Microsoft's but not so cumbersome. A visual threat modeling approach is greatly preferred to spreadsheet or quantitative approaches.
- The project should build on the information in the OWASP Application Security Desk Reference.
P006 - OWASP Corporate Application Security Rating Guide
- Project description: Help us benchmark the application security practices of the corporate world. Assess the top 50 companies and top 50 software companies for their practices. The goal is to make public what companies are doing in this area. OWASP Corporate Application Security Rating Guide has some sample materials for this project.
- The project will assess all public materials (interviews, presentations, briefings) for details
- The project will link to all source material used in creating the rating
P007 - OWASP Security Facts Label
- Project description: Design a security facts label methodology and supporting tool. Define a set of concrete measurable factors to include in the label
- Factors should cover the application itself as well as the people, teams, processes, tools, libraries, and supporting technologies that created it.
- Build a survey application to gather data and store in an XML file. Also create a label generation program that reads the XML and creates a compelling label.
P008 - OWASP Security Test Automation
- Project description: Create a tool that generates, records, and plays back security test cases (think JUnit) to enable regression testing for security. This could be based on WebScarab, Selenium, HTTPUnit or something else. But it would create test cases that are custom for a particular application, not a generic scanner.
- The tool should have wizards for common security related use cases, such as login, change password, authorized access, unauthorized access, etc... The tool should combine these security use cases with a set of predefined security tests to generate a custom set of security tests for an application. A simple example is that the tool would record the login transaction, and generate a security test to verify that the session cookie is changed (to defeat session fixation).
- The tool needs to be able to detect the success or failure of each test, not just repeat the actions required to perform the security relevant function.
- The tool could also use the output from static analysis to create test cases. A smaller scale project would be a research paper that shows exactly how one can use the details from static analysis to generate scanner/pentest cases.
P009 - OWASP Security Unit Test Framework
- Project description: Create a wizard that will generate security-specific JUnit test cases for all the security controls in your security library. The tool should ask questions about security methods and generate appropriate test cases.
- At a minimum, the tool should be able to generate test cases that validate that the validation methods canonicalize and encode properly, that the encoder does not use a blacklist, that the logging methods handle injection, that the hash algorithm is salted, that logout invalidates the user's session.
- The tool's coverage should roughly line up with the security methods defined in the OWASP ESAPI project.
P010 - OWASP Client-Side Browser Fingerprint Project
- Project description: Develop and document a technology that will create a "fingerprint" for a user's host/browser that can be used to detect when an attacker attempts to hijack their account. The server application can track changes to the client-generated fingerprint and request additional authentication if the fingerprint changes too radically. Such a technique can serve as an additional authentication factor in order to help prevent accounts from being hijacked due to authentication credential or session token theft.
- The tool should be configurable to tolerate expected changes in host/browser configuration, such as a browser update. The tool should flag when the host/browser changes in an unexpected way.
P011 - OWASP CLASP Refresh
- Project description: Reorganize and update the materials in the OWASP CLASP project to be more complete and comprehensive. Each of the activities must include detailed methodologies, so that they can be practiced repeatably by anyone with the appropriate background.
- The activities should include all the related job aides and materials to perform the activity, such as worksheets, report formats, databases, etc...
- No proprietary methodologies can be used as a part of CLASP.
P014 - OWASP Security Refactoring Tool Project
- Project description: Create a tool that refactors existing code to use safer versions of dangerous methods. The tool should rewrite the code to use safer calls and mark the changes in a way that they can easily be found and verified manually. A data-driven approach is preferred (similar to the Jackpot engine in NetBeans, but not required.
- For Java EE/JSP the code can be rewritten to use the safer alternatives available for many calls and patterns in the OWASP ESAPI project.
- For .NET, converters from unmanaged code to managed code (i.e. C++ to C#, VB6 to VB.Net, etc…).
P015 - OWASP BlackTop - Runtime Coverage Analysis Tool
- Project description: Develop and document a "blackbox" pen testing code analysis solution capable of providing runtime coverage analysis for applications written in Java and .NET. In order to ensure the solution does not require access to the applications' source code, the solution should use (for example) the AspectJ and PostSharp bytecode weaving frameworks.
- The tool should provide code level details and call trace information of all ingress and egress points of the application and be able to identify gaps in the "blackbox" testing to facilitate more accurate and complete pen testing. All output and configuration should be done using an open format (such as XML) and enable command line execution of the application.
- Either the Eclipse Public License or the Mozilla Public license is allowable.
- Funds available: 10,000 USD
- Sponsor: Ounce Labs
P016 - OWASP .NET Access Control Tool
- Project description: Create a tool that enables the easy development and use of CAS (Code Access Security) and RBS (Role Base Security) and frameworks for securing an application’s Business-Logic (for example using a CAS to prevent the user account’s from being changed, or an bank account from being accessed)
P019 - OWASP ColdFusion Security Project
- Project description: Create a guide and supporting tools to support people charged with securing ColdFusion web applications. The coverage should include all of the OWASP Top Ten and other important topics from OWASP, such as those included in the OWASP ESAPI project.
P020 - OWASP JUnit Static Analysis Integration Project
- Project description: Create an extension to JUnit that invokes a "static analyzer" as a test case. The specific static analysis technique doesn't matter, could be based on grep, BCEL, the Eclipse Model, FindBugs, or PMD. This will enable developers to detect software problems during development.
- You fail the test case if you use certain banned APIs. Or even better, if you have better static analysis, you fail the test case if you fail to do something more complex - like not logging in the method that calls isUserInRole().
P021 - OWASP Server Side Security Scanner
- Project description: Build a server-side scanner in a Java Filter. The idea is that you can scan (or fuzz) way more effectively from inside the web container. The filter can generate multiple HTTP requests. This approach to scanning can be more effective than external scanners, since it can parse web.xml, analyze the filesystem, do bytecode analysis, and more to generate an attack plan. It can also start scanning many times faster than a normal scanner.
- This approach to scanning can be more effective because it has access to the the session object, log files, filesystem, database and other system resources. This allows the scanner to test whether the attack actually worked or not, which is impossible for external scanners.
P023 - OWASP Code Review Tree
- Project description: Build a simple Eclipse plugin to build a "Reverse API" tree navigation system. The tree should be organized by Packages -> Classes -> Methods -> callsites. This will allow code reviewers to see exactly what calls are used in the application. For example, the user could quickly check to see if the application calls Runtime.exec(). This also makes it easy to find out what type of backend systems the application uses.
- Include a separate tree to search for non-method call security progress. This could include:
- List Entry Points (from web.xml and webcontent folders)
- Better search window that allows you to see the matching line of code
- An analysis work tree based on search (similar to the call tree/hierarchy)
- Simple findings & dangerous calls
- Concurrency issues (class member variable in Servlet, threadlocals)
- Include a separate tree to search for non-method call security progress. This could include:
Category Name Description Regex --------------- --------------- -------------- ----------- Code Quality Fixme Unfinished code (fixme|hack|bug) Authentication Password All access to credentials (password|username|credentials|key|certificate) Access Control JavaEE Possible authorization (isAdmin) Obscenity !$??%@*#$ Frustrated developers (censored)
P024 - OWASP Attack Surface Metric
- Project description: Define a useful method for describing the attack surface of a typical web application and produce tools or an easy methodology for calculating it on a real application.
- The attack surface metric should take into account the public URL space. And for each part of the URL space, the number of parameters/headers/cookies used. And for each parameter/header/cookie, how well is it validated and what is it used for. Does the input go to an interpreter, used in business logic, as a reference to private information.
- For example, adding a parameter that is used to make a boolean decision should affect the metric only a tiny bit. But an unvalidated parameter used in a call to the operating system should dramatically increase the attack surface.
- The methodology must be easily repeatable in a mechanical way. A tool to calculate the metric is highly preferred.
P026 - OWASP Java Sandbox Policy Tool
- Project description: Create a tool that facilitates the creation of accurate, useful Java security policy files.
- The tool should support a "learn" mode like a host based firewall that asks about any accesses it doesn't know about. You can do this by implementing an intercepting SecurityManager (instead of one that throws SecurityExceptions). The interface should allow the user to "generalize" the specific policy request to make a more general rule. For example if the request is for "/temp/file123.xls" you might want to generalize the policy to allow all access to the "/temp" directory.
- The tool should produce machine readable security.policy files that can be deployed with the application.