Difference between revisions of "GPC Agenda 2009-11-30"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with '== Previous meetings and Dial-in details == see GPC Meetings for previous GPC Meetings Agenda '''and the Dial-In details''' = Agenda = == Current …')
 
(Current Meeting)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
*Reviewers Drive,  
 
*Reviewers Drive,  
 
** [http://globalprojectscommittee.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/new-drive-for-project-reviewers/ Brad's Post],
 
** [http://globalprojectscommittee.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/new-drive-for-project-reviewers/ Brad's Post],
** [[OWASP Project Reviewers Database|Wiki page to receive information about hypothetical volunteer project reviewers ]].
 
 
**Next phase?
 
**Next phase?
***It seems to me that the next phases of this process could consist in pushing it forward by using this page to describe the review job role and, thereafter, by doing a call for reviewers through our leaders' mailing list.  
+
***Maybe the next phases of this process could consist in pushing it forward by using [[OWASP Project Reviewers Database|'''this page''']] to describe the review job role and, thereafter, by doing a call for reviewers through our leaders' mailing list.
 +
----
 +
*The [[:Category:OWASP Top Ten Project|'''OWASP Top Ten Project''']] is almost ready to be reviewed against the assessment criteria 2.0 and so we will need either a Board or a GPC member to act as Second Reviewer. Do we have any volunteers?
 +
----
 +
*Eduardo Neves from the Brazilian Chapter asks if his company can be considered [[:Category:Software Assurance Maturity Model|'''SAAM Project''']]'s sponsor if he allocates two of his company employees to translate it Portuguese. He also more broadly asks how does a sponsorship work.
  
 
== From Previous Meeting/Follow up  ==
 
== From Previous Meeting/Follow up  ==

Latest revision as of 12:02, 30 November 2009

Previous meetings and Dial-in details

see GPC Meetings for previous GPC Meetings Agenda and the Dial-In details

Agenda

Current Meeting

  • Reviewers Drive,
    • Brad's Post,
    • Next phase?
      • Maybe the next phases of this process could consist in pushing it forward by using this page to describe the review job role and, thereafter, by doing a call for reviewers through our leaders' mailing list.

  • The OWASP Top Ten Project is almost ready to be reviewed against the assessment criteria 2.0 and so we will need either a Board or a GPC member to act as Second Reviewer. Do we have any volunteers?

  • Eduardo Neves from the Brazilian Chapter asks if his company can be considered SAAM Project's sponsor if he allocates two of his company employees to translate it Portuguese. He also more broadly asks how does a sponsorship work.

From Previous Meeting/Follow up

Issues for next Meeting

  • Add here

Minutes

  • Meeting started 10H PM/GMT
  • Add here