Difference between revisions of "GPC Agenda 2009-11-23"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(Current Meeting)
(Current Meeting)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
** [[:Category:OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project|OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project]] is ready for assessment and needs '''TWO''' GPC reviewers as it hasn't been possible to find any volunteers within our project leaders. Volunteers?
 
** [[:Category:OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project|OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project]] is ready for assessment and needs '''TWO''' GPC reviewers as it hasn't been possible to find any volunteers within our project leaders. Volunteers?
  
** Releases translation process
+
* Releases translation process
*** Shall we handle this or let with other Committe?
+
** Shall we handle this or let with other Committe?
*** Define process only for docs or also tools?
+
** Define process only for docs or also tools?
  
 
----
 
----

Revision as of 17:52, 23 November 2009

Previous meetings and Dial-in details

see GPC Meetings for previous GPC Meetings Agenda and the Dial-In details

Agenda

Current Meeting

  • Leo wants to discuss about issues on usage of OWASP resources. Is this the right forum?
    • Brazilian AppSec Conference
    • Brazilian book that has a translated version of Top10 "integrally", without any reference to OWASP

  • Releases translation process
    • Shall we handle this or let with other Committe?
    • Define process only for docs or also tools?

  • Project Reviewers,
    • In the sequence of suggestions and comments previously made by Tom and Brad and Matt, I've created a first straw of the page to receive information about hypothetical volunteer project reviewers.
      • Please check it out and let me know if you think any changes have to be made.
      • Also, it seems to me that the next phases of this process could consist in pushing it forward by using this page to describe the review job role and, thereafter, by doing a call for reviewers through our leaders' mailing list.
      • If you agree with this methodology I ask if one of you have the spare cycles to produce the above referred job description. Later on a text to support the call for reviewers will also be needed - I will produce a first draft for your comments if nobody assumes first the task.

  • GPC participation at the Iberic Web Application Security conference (IBWAS09):
    • For GPC's information, Paulo is partially using his time to assist the conference management team.
    • We need a 1h slide deck about OWASP projects to be delivered at the next AppSec Conference in Madrid.

From Previous Meeting/Follow up

Issues for next Meeting

  • Add here

Minutes

  • Meeting started 10H PM/GMT
  • Add here