Difference between revisions of "Double Encoding"
|Line 1:||Line 1:|
|Line 105:||Line 106:|
[[:Category: Input Validation]]
[[:Category: Input Validation]]
|Line 111:||Line 121:|
Revision as of 15:28, 25 May 2008
Last revision (mm/dd/yy): 05/25/2008
This attack technique consists of encode user request parameters twice in hexadecimal format in order to bypass security controls or cause unexpected behavior from application.
By using double encoding it’s possible to bypass security filters that only decode user input once, being the second decoding process executed by backend platform or modules that properly handle encoded data but don't have the corresponding security checks in place.
Attackers can inject double encoding in pathnames or query strings to bypass authentication schema and security filters in use by web application.
There are some common characters sets that are used in Web applications attacks. For example, in directory traversal attacks, it uses “../” (dot-dot-slash) , while in XSS attacks, it uses “<” and “>” characters. These characters give hexadecimal representation that differs from normal data.
For example, “../” (dot-dot-slash) characters represents %2E%2E%2f in hexadecimal representation. When the % symbol is encoded again, its representation in hexadecimal code is %25. The resultant from double encoding process ”../”(dot-dot-slash) would be %252E%252E%252F:
Hexadecimal encode of “../” represents "%2E%2E%2f"
Then encoding the “%” represents "%25"
Double encoding of “../” represents "%252E%252E%252F"
- Talk about the factors that make this attack likely or unlikely to actually happen
- You can mention the likely technical impact of an attack
- The [business impact] of an attack is probably conjecture, leave it out unless you're sure
This example presents an old well-know vulnerability found on IIS versions 4.0 and 5.0, where an attacker could bypass authorization schema and gain access to any file on the same drive as the web root directory due an issue on decoding mechanism. For more details about folder traversal vulnerability, see CVE 2001-0333.
In this scenario, the victim has an published executable directory (e.g. cgi) that’s stored on the same partition of Windows system folder. An attacker could execute arbitrary commands on the web server by submitting the following URL:
However, the application uses a security check filter that refuses requests containing characters like “../”. By double encoding the URL, it’s possible to bypass security the filter:
Double encoded URL:
A double encoding URL can be used to exploit XSS attack in order to bypass a built-in XSS detection module. Depending on implementation, the first decoding process is performed by HTTP protocol and the resultant encoded URL will bypass XSS filter, since it has no mechanisms to improve detection. A simple example XSS would be:
This malicious code could be inserted into a vulnerable application, resulting in a alert window with message “XSS”. However the web application can have a character filter such as “< “, “>” and “/”, since they are used to perform web application attacks. The attacker could use double encoding technique to bypass the filter and exploit client’s session. The encoding process for this Java script is:
|Char||Hex encode||Then encoding '%'||Double encode|
Finally, the malicious double encoding code is:
Related Threat Agents
Note: contents of "Avoidance and Mitigation" and "Countermeasure" Sections should be placed here