Difference between revisions of "Designer"

Jump to: navigation, search
Line 16: Line 16:
[[Category:CLASP Role]]
[[Category:CLASP Role]]
[[Category:OWASP CLASP Project]]

Revision as of 00:27, 27 May 2006

Role Description

The primary responsibility of the designer is to keep security risks out of the application, whenever possible. This responsibility has many facets:

  • First, he must figure out what technologies will satisfy security requirements and research them well enough to determine how to use those technologies properly.
  • Second, if a security flaw is found in the application, it is usually up to the designer to assess the consequences and determine how to best address the problem.
  • Finally, the designer needs to help support measuring the quality of application security efforts. Generally, this involves providing data that can be used as metrics or as a foundation for an application security review.

For example, the designer should explicitly document the “attack surface” of an application — which is roughly equal to the entry points to an application that may be visible to an attacker. This data can be used in a metric roughly akin to traditional software complexity metrics; it is also an excellent starting point for those who are looking to determine whether there are exploitable risks in software. Designers have the most security-relevant work of all the traditional development roles:

  • They should push back on requirements that may have unrecognized security risks.
  • They need to give implementers a roadmap in order to minimize the risk of errors requiring an expensive fix.
  • They also need to understand the security risks of integrating third-party software.
  • In addition, they are generally the point person for responding to security risks identified in the software.

Thus, designers should maintain a high level of security awareness; we recommend reading CLASP Resources A, B, C and D thoroughly.