Difference between revisions of "Codereview-Session-Management"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(Description)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
'''Session ID:'''
 
'''Session ID:'''
 +
 
Authenticated users should have a robust and cryptographically secure association with their session. The session identifier (Session ID) should not be predictable, and generation of such should be left to the underlying framework. The development effort to produce a session with sufficient entropy is subject to errors, and best left to tried and trusted methods.  
 
Authenticated users should have a robust and cryptographically secure association with their session. The session identifier (Session ID) should not be predictable, and generation of such should be left to the underlying framework. The development effort to produce a session with sufficient entropy is subject to errors, and best left to tried and trusted methods.  
  

Revision as of 08:25, 12 January 2009

Introduction

OWASP Code Review Guide Table of Contents

Contents


Description

Session management from a code review perspective should focus on the creation, renewal, and destruction of a user’s session throughout the application. The code review process should ensure the following:

Session ID:

Authenticated users should have a robust and cryptographically secure association with their session. The session identifier (Session ID) should not be predictable, and generation of such should be left to the underlying framework. The development effort to produce a session with sufficient entropy is subject to errors, and best left to tried and trusted methods.

Authorization:

  • Applications should check if the session is valid prior to servicing any user requests. The user's session object may also hold authorization data.
  • Session ID should be applied to a new user upon successful authentication.
  • Reviewing the code to identify where sessions are created and invalidated is important. A user should be assigned a new unique session once authenticated to mitigate session fixation attacks.
  • Sessions may need to be terminated upon authorization failures. If a logical condition exists which is not possible, unless the state transition is circumvented or an obvious attempt to escalate privileges, a session should be terminated.


Session Transport Applications avoid or prevent common web attacks, such as replay, request forging, and man-in-the-middle.

  • Session identifiers should be passed to the user in a secure manner such as not using HTTP GET with the session ID being placed in the query string. Such data (query string) is logged in web server logs.
  • Cookie transport should be performed over a secure channel. Review the code in relation to cookie manipulation. Verify if the secure flag is set. This prevents the cookie being transported over a non-secure channel.


Session lifecycle

  • Session Timeout - Sessions should have a defined inactivity timeout and also in some cases a session hard-limit. The code review should examine such session settings. They may be defined in configuration files or in the code itself. Hard limits shall kill a session regardless of session activity.
  • The log-out commands must do more that simply kill the browser. Review the code to verify that log-out commands invalidate the session on the server. Upon the logout request, be it a parameter or URL, one must review the code to ensure the session is invalidated.

Example for session invalidate:

import java.io.*; import javax.servlet.*; import javax.servlet.http.*; import java.sql.*; public class doLogout extends HttpServlet { public void doGet(HttpServletRequest req,HttpServletResponse res)throws ServletException,IOException { res.setContentType("text/html"); HttpSession ses =req.getSession(); ses.removeValue("Login"); ses.removeValue("password");

        ses.invalidate();	 			

res.sendRedirect("http://company.com/servlets/login.html"); } }


Related Vulnerabilities