Difference between revisions of "Chapters Assigned"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(Examples by Vulnerability)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
#Steps and Roles
 
#Steps and Roles
 
#Code Review Processes
 
#Code Review Processes
 +
#Transaction Analysis - E Keary
  
 
== Design review ==
 
== Design review ==
Line 24: Line 25:
 
#Reviewing Code for Logging Issues - 70%
 
#Reviewing Code for Logging Issues - 70%
 
#Reviewing The Secure Code Environment - E Keary
 
#Reviewing The Secure Code Environment - E Keary
#Transaction Analysis - E Keary
 
 
#Authorization (Currently linked to "The Development Guide")
 
#Authorization (Currently linked to "The Development Guide")
 
#Authentication (Code review)
 
#Authentication (Code review)
Line 32: Line 32:
 
#Dangerous HTTP Methods ( Secure deployment)
 
#Dangerous HTTP Methods ( Secure deployment)
 
#Race Conditions
 
#Race Conditions
 +
  
 
== Language specific best practice ==
 
== Language specific best practice ==
  
 
===Java===  
 
===Java===  
#Inner classes (Paolo Perego)
+
#Java overview J Manico
#Class comparison (Paolo Perego)
+
#Java applet code review  J Manico
#Cloneable classes (Paolo Perego)
+
#Java server (J2EE) code review  J Manico
#Serializable classes (Paolo Perego)
+
#Package scope and encapsulation (Paolo Perego)
+
#Mutable objects (Paolo Perego)
+
#Private methods & circumvention (Paolo Perego)
+
  
 
===.NET===
 
===.NET===
Line 56: Line 53:
 
===Stored Procs===
 
===Stored Procs===
  
 +
===RUBY===
  
 
===C/C++===
 
===C/C++===
Line 68: Line 66:
 
#Education and cultural change
 
#Education and cultural change
 
#Tool Deployment Model
 
#Tool Deployment Model
 
+
#Code Auditor Workbench Tool (100%)
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 09:55, 31 January 2007

Contents

Methodology

  1. Code Review Introduction
  2. Steps and Roles
  3. Code Review Processes
  4. Transaction Analysis - E Keary

Design review

  1. Designing for security
    1. - M Roxberry(.NET)
    2. - Paolo Perego (Java)
    3. - Andrew van der Stock (PHP)
    4. - Paolo Perego (C)
    5. - C++
    6. - Andrew van der Stock (MySQL)
    7. - Mallory (AJAX)

Examples by Vulnerability

  1. Reviewing Code for Buffer Overruns and Overflows - 70%
  2. Reviewing Code for OS Injection - 70%
  3. Reviewing Code for SQL Injection - 70%
  4. Reviewing Code for Data Validation - Jenelle Chapman / E Keary
  5. Reviewing code for XSS issues - 70%
  6. Reviewing Code for Error Handling - Jenelle Chapman
  7. Reviewing Code for Logging Issues - 70%
  8. Reviewing The Secure Code Environment - E Keary
  9. Authorization (Currently linked to "The Development Guide")
  10. Authentication (Code review)
  11. Session Integrity
  12. Cross Site Request Forgery
  13. Cryptography (Currently linked to "The Development Guide")
  14. Dangerous HTTP Methods ( Secure deployment)
  15. Race Conditions


Language specific best practice

Java

  1. Java overview J Manico
  2. Java applet code review J Manico
  3. Java server (J2EE) code review J Manico

.NET

PHP

Assigned to Andrew van der Stock

MySQL

Assigned to Andrew van der Stock

Stored Procs

RUBY

C/C++

  1. Memory management (Paolo Perego)
  2. String management (Paolo Perego)
  3. Secure access to file system items (Paolo Perego)

Automating Code Reviews

  1. Preface
  2. Reasons for using automated tools
  3. Education and cultural change
  4. Tool Deployment Model
  5. Code Auditor Workbench Tool (100%)

References