Category talk:Threat Agent

Revision as of 06:11, 26 May 2009 by Deleted user (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

[ asian institute of medicine science technology ] webmap asian cac cua nuoc thu trong [ ingersoll rand australia ] [ auto cleveland heights master sales ] [ easy auto loan ] [ asian golden cat ] [ airport rent a car australia ] [ auto accident investigations ] [ phila auto show discount ] [ australias plants and animals ] [ antivirus free download trial ] norton antivirus freeware download [ symetic antivirus ] link [ cantaloop flip fantasia lyrics ] [ automotive labor rate ] [ asian dvd sale ] [ hba insurance australia ] [ ] [ antivirus w32 rontokbro ] [ agrisoft antivirus ] [ stinger antivirus tools ] [ antivirus cleanup ] [ bunnings australia ] http [ asia central eastern europe farmer ] [ south african art painter ] [ reasons for immigration to australia ] [ ude asia capital ] [ antivirus review best ] [ cyberscrub antivirus review ] [ automated feeder metal nut system technology ] [ antivirus free trial download ] [ africa annual highest rainfall ] [ south africans worldwide ] [ asian furnitures ] [ nortons antivirus software ] [ asian chili sauce ] [ i talk cellular south africa ] [ espn2 australian open finals ] [ clear coat auto paint ] [ autosmart australia ] link [ autosurf autosurf free site ] [ copper deposits in australia ] [ norton antivirus keygen download ] top [ vancouver auto mall washington ] [ harry potter autographs ] I can appreciate the attempt made to clarify threats with respect to risk, but a redirection on the wiki from threat to threat agent does not, in my opinion, clarify the most basic concept of threat. The definition of 'threat agent' is distinct from the definition of 'threat'. Agent implies a causative entity and, in the case of the wiki entry, I think has been roughly sketched. What has not been done yet is to define the types of events (the threat) the causative entity (threat agent) brings about. Perhaps a rough workflow of a standard security event (a system compromise) will serve to identify the necessary components that need definition. This may also provide the context needed to keep the definitions from shifting. Here is my previous comment on threat: Category_talk:Threat

Thanks for the comments. You're absolutely right. The intent was not to indicate that 'threat' and 'threat agent' are the same thing. We simply moved the page and it left a redirect behind automatically. I like the idea of creating a model for the 'workflow' or attack-flow or risk-flow or whatever. Can you help us put an article together?