Difference between revisions of "Brute force attack"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Categories)
(34 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Template:Attack}}
 
{{Template:Attack}}
 +
<br>
 +
[[Category:OWASP ASDR Project]]
 +
 +
 +
Last revision (mm/dd/yy): '''{{REVISIONMONTH}}/{{REVISIONDAY}}/{{REVISIONYEAR}}'''
 +
 +
 +
==Related Security Activities==
 +
 +
===How to Test for Brute Force Vulnerabilities===
 +
 +
See the [[:Category:OWASP Testing Project|OWASP Testing Guide]] article on how to [[Testing for Brute Force  (OWASP-AT-004)|Test for Brute Force]] Vulnerabilities.
 +
 +
 +
Last revision (mm/dd/yy): '''{{REVISIONMONTH}}/{{REVISIONDAY}}/{{REVISIONYEAR}}'''
  
 
==Description==
 
==Description==
  
During this type of attacks the attacker is trying to bypass security mechanisms having a minimal knowledge about them. Using one or more of accessible methods: dictionary attack (with or without mutations), brute-force attack (with given classes of characters e.g.: alphanuerical, special, case (in)sensitive) the attacker is trying to achive his/her goal. Considering a given method, number of tries, efficiency of the system, which conducts the attack and estimated efficiency of the system which is attacked, the attacker is able to calculate for how long the attack will have to lasts. Non brute-force attacks in the other hand, which includes all classes of characters, gives no certeinty of success.
+
During this type of attack, the attacker is trying to bypass security mechanisms while having minimal knowledge about them. Using one or more accessible methods: dictionary attack (with or without mutations), brute-force attack (with given classes of characters e.g.: alphanumerical, special, case (in)sensitive) the attacker is trying to achieve his/her goal. Considering a given method, number of tries, efficiency of the system, which conducts the attack and estimated efficiency of the system which is attacked, the attacker is able to calculate how long the attack will have to last. Non brute-force attacks, on the other hand, which includes all classes of characters, give no certainty of success.
 +
 
 +
==Risk Factors==
 +
TBD
  
==Examples ==
+
==Examples==
  
The brute-force attacks are mainly used in the context of guessing passwords and bypassing access control. However there are a lot of tools which uses this techinque to examinate the web service's catalogue structures and seeks interesting, from the attacker's point of view, information. Very often the target of an attack are data in forms (GET/POST) and user's Session-IDs.
+
Brute-force attacks are mainly used for guessing passwords and bypassing access control. However there are a lot of tools which use this techinque to examine the web service's catalogue structures and seek interesting, from the attacker's point of view, information. Very often the target of an attack are data in forms (GET/POST) and users' Session-IDs.
  
 +
===Example 1===
  
In the first scenerio, where the goal of brute-forcing is to get to know the password in its decrypted form, it may appear that john the ripper (http://www.openwall.com/john/) is a very helpfull tool. TOP10 tools for password cracking with different methods, including brute-force, may be found on
+
In the first scenerio, where the goal of brute-forcing is to know the password in its decrypted form, it may appear that [http://www.openwall.com/john/ John the Ripper] is a very helpful tool. The TOP10 tools for password cracking with different methods, including brute-force, may be found on
 
http://sectools.org/crackers.html.
 
http://sectools.org/crackers.html.
  
Line 30: Line 49:
  
 
The simplest test to perform is:
 
The simplest test to perform is:
 
+
<pre>
 
rezos@dojo ~/d/owasp_tools/dirb $ ./dirb http://testsite.test/
 
rezos@dojo ~/d/owasp_tools/dirb $ ./dirb http://testsite.test/
 
-----------------
 
-----------------
Line 51: Line 70:
 
FOUND: http://testsite.test/phpmyadmin/
 
FOUND: http://testsite.test/phpmyadmin/
 
       (***) DIRECTORY (*)
 
       (***) DIRECTORY (*)
 
+
</pre>
In the output the attacker is informed that phpmyadmin/ catalogue was found. The attacker who knows that, is now able to perform the attack on this application. In dirb's templates there is among others a dictionary containing information about invalid httpd configuration. This dictionary will detect weaknesses of this kind.
+
In the output the attacker is informed that phpmyadmin/ catalogue was found. The attacker who knows that is now able to perform the attack on this application. In dirb's templates there is, among others, a dictionary containing information about invalid httpd configuration. This dictionary will detect weaknesses of this kind.
  
  
Line 58: Line 77:
  
  
Application WebRoot.pl written by CIRT.DK (http://www.cirt.dk/tools/webroot/WebRoot.txt) has embedded mechanisms for parsing server responses and basing on the phrase, wchich was specified by the attacker, it measures if the server response is expected.
+
The application [http://www.cirt.dk/tools/webroot/WebRoot.txt WebRoot.pl], written by CIRT.DK, has embedded mechanisms for parsing server responses, and based on the phrase specified by the attacker, measures if the server response is expected.
  
E.g.:
+
For example:
  
  
Line 92: Line 111:
  
 
Another example is to examine ranges of the variable's values:
 
Another example is to examine ranges of the variable's values:
 +
<pre>
 +
./WebRoot.pl -noupdate -host testsite.test -port 80 -verbose -diff "Error" -url "/index.php?id=<BRUTE>" -incremental integer -minimum 1 -maximum 1
 +
</pre>
  
 +
==Defensive Tools==
  
./WebRoot.pl -noupdate -host testsite.test -port 80 -verbose -diff "Error" -url "/index.php?id=<BRUTE>" -incremental integer -minimum 1 -maximum 1
+
'''Php-Brute-Force-Attack Detector'''
 +
 
 +
http://yehg.net/lab/pr0js/files.php/php_brute_force_detect.zip
  
==Related Threats==
+
Detect your web servers being scanned by brute force tools such as WFuzz, OWASP DirBuster and vulnerability scanners such as Nessus, Nikto, Acunetix ..etc. This helps you quickly identify probable probing by bad guys who's wanna dig possible security holes.
  
?
+
http://yehg.net/lab/pr0js/tools/php-brute-force-detector-readme.pdf
  
==Related Attacks==
+
==Related [[Threat Agents]]==
 +
* [[:Category:Authentication]]
  
*[[Blind SQL Injection]]
+
==Related [[Attacks]]==
*[[Blind XPath Injection]]
+
* [[Blind SQL Injection]]
 +
* [[Blind XPath Injection]]
  
==Related Vulnerabilities==
+
==Related [[Vulnerabilities]]==
 +
* [[Insufficient Session-ID Length]]
  
*[[Weak credentials]]
+
==Related [[Controls]]==
*[[J2EE Misconfiguration: Insufficient Session-ID Length]]
+
* [[Authentication]]
  
==Related Countermeasures==
+
==References==
 +
TBD
  
*[[Salted hashes]]
 
*[[Password based authentication]]
 
  
==Categories==
 
  
[[Category:Attack]]
 
 
[[Category:Probabilistic Techniques]]
 
[[Category:Probabilistic Techniques]]
 +
[[Category: Attack]]

Revision as of 06:37, 23 April 2009

This is an Attack. To view all attacks, please see the Attack Category page.




Last revision (mm/dd/yy): 04/23/2009


Related Security Activities

How to Test for Brute Force Vulnerabilities

See the OWASP Testing Guide article on how to Test for Brute Force Vulnerabilities.


Last revision (mm/dd/yy): 04/23/2009

Description

During this type of attack, the attacker is trying to bypass security mechanisms while having minimal knowledge about them. Using one or more accessible methods: dictionary attack (with or without mutations), brute-force attack (with given classes of characters e.g.: alphanumerical, special, case (in)sensitive) the attacker is trying to achieve his/her goal. Considering a given method, number of tries, efficiency of the system, which conducts the attack and estimated efficiency of the system which is attacked, the attacker is able to calculate how long the attack will have to last. Non brute-force attacks, on the other hand, which includes all classes of characters, give no certainty of success.

Risk Factors

TBD

Examples

Brute-force attacks are mainly used for guessing passwords and bypassing access control. However there are a lot of tools which use this techinque to examine the web service's catalogue structures and seek interesting, from the attacker's point of view, information. Very often the target of an attack are data in forms (GET/POST) and users' Session-IDs.

Example 1

In the first scenerio, where the goal of brute-forcing is to know the password in its decrypted form, it may appear that John the Ripper is a very helpful tool. The TOP10 tools for password cracking with different methods, including brute-force, may be found on http://sectools.org/crackers.html.


For testing web services there are tools like:

- dirb (http://sourceforge.net/projects/dirb/)
- WebRoot (http://www.cirt.dk/tools/webroot/WebRoot.txt)


dirb belongs to more advanced tools. With its help we are able to:

- set cookies
- add any HTTP header
- use PROXY
- mutate objects which were found
- test http(s) connections
- seek catalogues and/or files using defined dictionaries and templates
- and much much more


The simplest test to perform is:

rezos@dojo ~/d/owasp_tools/dirb $ ./dirb http://testsite.test/
-----------------
DIRB v1.9
By The Dark Raver
-----------------
START_TIME: Mon Jul  9 23:13:16 2007
URL_BASE: http://testsite.test/
WORDLIST_FILES: wordlists/common.txt
SERVER_BANNER: lighttpd/1.4.15
NOT_EXISTANT_CODE: 404 [NOT FOUND]
(Location: '' - Size: 345)

-----------------

Generating Wordlist...
Generated Words: 839

---- Scanning URL: http://testsite.test/ ----
FOUND: http://testsite.test/phpmyadmin/
       (***) DIRECTORY (*)

In the output the attacker is informed that phpmyadmin/ catalogue was found. The attacker who knows that is now able to perform the attack on this application. In dirb's templates there is, among others, a dictionary containing information about invalid httpd configuration. This dictionary will detect weaknesses of this kind.


One of the main problems with tools like dirb is recognition if the given response from the server is expected and reliable. With more advanced server configuration (e.g. with mod_rewrite) automatic tools are unable to determine if server response informs about an error or that the file, which the attacker is after, was found.


The application WebRoot.pl, written by CIRT.DK, has embedded mechanisms for parsing server responses, and based on the phrase specified by the attacker, measures if the server response is expected.

For example:


Np.

./WebRoot.pl -noupdate -host testsite.test -port 80 -verbose -match "test" -url "/private/<BRUTE>" -incremental lowercase -minimum 1 -maximum 1


oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00
o          Webserver Bruteforcing 1.8          o
0  ************* !!! WARNING !!! ************  0
0  ******* FOR PENETRATION USE ONLY *********  0
0  ******************************************  0
o       (c)2007 by Dennis Rand - CIRT.DK       o
oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00
[X] Checking for updates                - NO CHECK
[X] Checking for False Positive Scan    - OK
[X] Using Incremental                   - OK
[X] Starting Scan                       - OK
   GET /private/b HTTP/1.1
   GET /private/z HTTP/1.1
[X] Scan complete                       - OK
[X] Total attempts                      - 26
[X] Sucessfull attempts                 - 1
oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00

WebRoot.pl found one file "/private/b" on testsite.test, which contains phrase "test".


Another example is to examine ranges of the variable's values:

./WebRoot.pl -noupdate -host testsite.test -port 80 -verbose -diff "Error" -url "/index.php?id=<BRUTE>" -incremental integer -minimum 1 -maximum 1

Defensive Tools

Php-Brute-Force-Attack Detector

http://yehg.net/lab/pr0js/files.php/php_brute_force_detect.zip

Detect your web servers being scanned by brute force tools such as WFuzz, OWASP DirBuster and vulnerability scanners such as Nessus, Nikto, Acunetix ..etc. This helps you quickly identify probable probing by bad guys who's wanna dig possible security holes.

http://yehg.net/lab/pr0js/tools/php-brute-force-detector-readme.pdf

Related Threat Agents

Related Attacks

Related Vulnerabilities

Related Controls

References

TBD