Difference between revisions of "Brute force attack"
(adjustments to new template)
|Line 5:||Line 5:|
During this type of
During this type of the attacker is trying to bypass security mechanisms having minimal knowledge about them. Using one or more of accessible methods: dictionary attack (with or without mutations), brute-force attack (with given classes of characters e.g.: alphanuerical, special, case (in)sensitive) the attacker is trying to achive his/her goal. Considering a given method, number of tries, efficiency of the system, which conducts the attack and estimated efficiency of the system which is attacked, the attacker is able to calculate for how long the attack will have to lasts. Non brute-force attacksthe other hand, which includes all classes of characters, gives no of success.
Revision as of 04:58, 6 September 2008
Last revision (mm/dd/yy): 09/6/2008
During this type of attack, the attacker is trying to bypass security mechanisms while having minimal knowledge about them. Using one or more of accessible methods: dictionary attack (with or without mutations), brute-force attack (with given classes of characters e.g.: alphanuerical, special, case (in)sensitive) the attacker is trying to achive his/her goal. Considering a given method, number of tries, efficiency of the system, which conducts the attack and estimated efficiency of the system which is attacked, the attacker is able to calculate for how long the attack will have to lasts. Non brute-force attacks, on the other hand, which includes all classes of characters, gives no certainty of success.
The brute-force attacks are mainly used in the context of guessing passwords and bypassing access control. However there are a lot of tools which uses this techinque to examinate the web service's catalogue structures and seeks interesting, from the attacker's point of view, information. Very often the target of an attack are data in forms (GET/POST) and user's Session-IDs.
In the first scenerio, where the goal of brute-forcing is to get to know the password in its decrypted form, it may appear that john the ripper (http://www.openwall.com/john/) is a very helpfull tool. TOP10 tools for password cracking with different methods, including brute-force, may be found on http://sectools.org/crackers.html.
For testing web services there are tools like:
- dirb (http://sourceforge.net/projects/dirb/) - WebRoot (http://www.cirt.dk/tools/webroot/WebRoot.txt)
dirb belongs to more advanced tools. With its help we are able to:
- set cookies - add any HTTP header - use PROXY - mutate objects which were found - test http(s) connections - seek catalogues and/or files using defined dictionaries and templates - and much much more
The simplest test to perform is:
rezos@dojo ~/d/owasp_tools/dirb $ ./dirb http://testsite.test/ ----------------- DIRB v1.9 By The Dark Raver ----------------- START_TIME: Mon Jul 9 23:13:16 2007 URL_BASE: http://testsite.test/ WORDLIST_FILES: wordlists/common.txt SERVER_BANNER: lighttpd/1.4.15 NOT_EXISTANT_CODE: 404 [NOT FOUND] (Location: '' - Size: 345) ----------------- Generating Wordlist... Generated Words: 839 ---- Scanning URL: http://testsite.test/ ---- FOUND: http://testsite.test/phpmyadmin/ (***) DIRECTORY (*)
In the output the attacker is informed that phpmyadmin/ catalogue was found. The attacker who knows that, is now able to perform the attack on this application. In dirb's templates there is among others a dictionary containing information about invalid httpd configuration. This dictionary will detect weaknesses of this kind.
One of the main problems with tools like dirb is recognition if the given response from the server is expected and reliable. With more advanced server configuration (e.g. with mod_rewrite) automatic tools are unable to determine if server response informs about an error or that the file, which the attacker is after, was found.
Application WebRoot.pl written by CIRT.DK (http://www.cirt.dk/tools/webroot/WebRoot.txt) has embedded mechanisms for parsing server responses and basing on the phrase, wchich was specified by the attacker, it measures if the server response is expected.
./WebRoot.pl -noupdate -host testsite.test -port 80 -verbose -match "test" -url "/private/<BRUTE>" -incremental lowercase -minimum 1 -maximum 1
oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00 o Webserver Bruteforcing 1.8 o 0 ************* !!! WARNING !!! ************ 0 0 ******* FOR PENETRATION USE ONLY ********* 0 0 ****************************************** 0 o (c)2007 by Dennis Rand - CIRT.DK o oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00
[X] Checking for updates - NO CHECK [X] Checking for False Positive Scan - OK [X] Using Incremental - OK [X] Starting Scan - OK GET /private/b HTTP/1.1 GET /private/z HTTP/1.1
[X] Scan complete - OK [X] Total attempts - 26 [X] Sucessfull attempts - 1 oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00oo00
WebRoot.pl found one file "/private/b" on testsite.test, which contains phrase "test".
Another example is to examine ranges of the variable's values:
./WebRoot.pl -noupdate -host testsite.test -port 80 -verbose -diff "Error" -url "/index.php?id=<BRUTE>" -incremental integer -minimum 1 -maximum 1
Related Threat Agents