Difference between revisions of ".Net Full Trust"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(Reverting to last version not containing links to s1.shard.jp)
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This page contains links to Dinis' Research on the problems of .Net's Full Trust
+
This page contains links to [[User:Dinis.cruz|Dinis]]' research on the problems of .Net's Full Trust.
  
 +
Note: this section is under construction, there are still quite a number of resources that need to be added.
  
 
== Articles and Posts trying to raise attention to this issue ==
 
== Articles and Posts trying to raise attention to this issue ==
 +
* [[An 'Asp.Net' accident waiting to happen]]
 +
* [[Microsoft must deliver secure environments not tools to write secure code]]
 +
* [[Full Trust Asp.Net Security Vulnerabilties, and Microsoft's current position]]
 +
* [[Current Microsoft Info about CAS and Full Trust]]
 +
* [[What are the 'Real World' security advantages of the .Net Framework and the JVM?]]
  
[[Full Trust Asp.Net Security Vulnerabilties, and Microsoft's current position]]
+
== Other (misc) ==
 +
* [[Microsoft's 'Full Trust ASP.NET in IIS 6.0 is Insecure by Design, by Default and in Deployment' Internal White Paper]]
 +
* [[Secure by de...what? (User instances in SQL Server 2005 Express Edition)]]
 +
* [[The .Net Framework is also affected by the WMF vulnerabilty]]
 +
* [[Mono vs Medium Trust]]
 +
* [['Is .NET A Wrapper Around Win32?' and 'Analysis of .NET Use in Longhorn and Vista']]
  
 +
{{Stub}}
  
 
[[Category:OWASP .NET Project]]
 
[[Category:OWASP .NET Project]]

Latest revision as of 07:50, 3 June 2009

This page contains links to Dinis' research on the problems of .Net's Full Trust.

Note: this section is under construction, there are still quite a number of resources that need to be added.

Articles and Posts trying to raise attention to this issue

Other (misc)

This article is a stub. You can help OWASP by expanding it or discussing it on its Talk page.