Project Information:template Code Crawler - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I

Project Deliveries & Objectives

CodeCrawler's Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

Code Crawler is a stable an easy to use tool

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

100%

3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

Documentation to improve. It should be nice to indicate how many High, Medium and low vulnerabilities the tool has founded.
PART II

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

None.

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

None.

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

The project seems to be in beta quality. It does a quick code review of .net and java files, but needs more documentations and some improvement from the OWASP Code Review project.

4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

More feedback from the OWASP Community.