Test Upload of Malicious Files (OTG-BUSLOGIC-009)

Brief Description
Suppose a picture sharing application allows users to upload their .gif or .jpg graphic files to the web site. What if an attacker is able to upload a PHP shell, or exe file, or virus? The attacker may then upload the file that may be saved on the system and the virus may spread itself or through remote processes exes or shell code can be executed.

Vulnerabilities related to the uploading of malicious files is unique in that these “malicious” files can easily be rejected through scanning during the upload process. Additionally, this is different from uploading unexpected files in that while the file type may be accepted the file may still be malicious to the system.

Issue
The application may allow the upload of malicious files that include exploits or shellcode without submitting them to malicious file scanning. Malicious files could be detected and stopped at various points of the application architecture such as: IPS/IDS, application server anti-virus software or anti-virus scanning by application as files are uploaded (perhaps offloading the scanning using SCAP).

Example
Suppose a picture sharing application allows users to upload .gif or .jpg files to the web site. What if an attacker is able to submit a file that is in reality .gif or .jpg passing the “file type check “ but what if the file contains a simple PHP shell embedded in a jpg file?

Testing Method
Generic Testing Method

• Develop or acquire a known “malicious” file.

• Try to successfully upload the malicious file to the application/system.

Specific Testing Method 1

•	Using the Metasploit payload generation functionality generates a shellcode as a Windows executable using the Metasploit "msfpayload" command.

•	Submit the executable via the application’s upload functionality and see if it is accepted or correctly rejected.

Specific Testing Method 2

•	Develop or create a file that should fail the application malware detection process. There are many available on the Internet such as ducklin.htm or ducklin-html.htm.

•	Submit the executable via the application’s upload functionality and see if it is accepted or correctly rejected.

Specific Testing Method 3

•	Set up the intercepting proxy to capture the “valid” request for an accepted file.

•	Send an “invalid” request through with a valid/acceptable file extension and see if the request is accepted or properly rejected.

Test Tools
• Metasploit's payload generation functionality

• Intercepting proxy

Related Test Cases
4.3.3 Test File Extensions Handling for Sensitive Information (OTG-CONFIG-003)

4.12.8 Test Upload of Unexpected File Types (OTG-BUSLOGIC-008)

Remediation
While safeguards such as black or white listing of file extensions, using “Content-Type” from the header, or using a file type recognizer may not always be protections against this type of vulnerability. Every application that accepts files from users must have a mechanism to verify that the uploaded file does not contain malicious code. Uploaded files should never be stored where the users or attackers can directly access them.