Virginia

About
The OWASP Washington VA Local Chapter meetings are FREE and OPEN to anyone interested in learning more about application security. We encourage individuals to provide knowledge transfer via hands-on training and presentations of specific OWASP projects and research topics and sharing SDLC knowledge.

We the encourage vendor-agnostic presentations to utilize the OWASP Powerpoint template when applicable and individual volunteerism to enable perpetual growth. As a 501(3)c non-profit association donations of meeting space or refreshments sponsorship is encouraged, simply contact the local chapter leaders listed on this page to discuss. Prior to participating with OWASP please review the Chapter Rules.

The chapter is committed to providing an engaging experience for a variety of audience types ranging from local students and those beginning in app-sec, to those experienced and accomplished professionals who are looking for competent collaborators for OWASP-related projects. To this end, we will continue to conduct both monthly chapter meetings as well as out-of-band curricula, on application security topics.

{{Chapter Template|chaptername=Virginia|extra=The chapter leader is [mailto:John.Steven@owasp.org John Steven]

Program Committee
The OWASP NoVA Chapter Program Committee aims to:

Actively shepherd speakers and and speaking process within the NoVA chapter in order to assure that chapter meetings provide maximum practical benefit to our constituency.

Benefit the broader OWASP community by creating and supporting a 'preferred speaker' list through explicitly gauging, documenting, and sharing speaker quality data gained through feedback from chapter participants.

In pursuit of this charter, we will elect as many as five program committee members that will, over the course of 2010:


 * Create easy-to-apply vetting criteria from existing OWASP chapter guidance and ethics rules.
 * Assure one program committee personnel applies vetting criteria to each-and-every proposed chapter speaker/material
 * Design, document, and implement a chapter participant "speaker survey" / voting mechanism
 * Implement a "speaker survey" results display on the OWASP Wiki for the broader OWASP community to consume
 * Coordinate with other chapters to set up a 'preferred speaker' list that aggregates data about high-scoring speakers (for the OWASP on-the-move project)

We will be announcing program committee membership shortly.


 * mailinglistsite=http://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-CHANGEME|emailarchives=http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-CHANGEME}}


 * Click here to join local chapter mailing list
 * Add January 7th to my Google Calendar

History
The original DC Chapter was founded in June 2004 by [mailto:jeff.williams@owasp.org Jeff Williams] and has had members from Virginia to Delaware. In April 2005 a new chapter, OWASP Washington VA Local Chapter, was formed and the DC Chapter was renamed to DC-Maryland. The two are sister chapters and include common members and shared discourse. The chapters meet in opposite halves of the month to facilitate this relationship.

Locations
If you plan to attend in person:

Directions to Booz Allen's One Dulles facility:

13200 Woodland Park Road Herndon, VA 20171

From Tyson's Corner:


 * Take LEESBURG PIKE / VA-7 WEST
 * Merge onto VA-267 WEST / DULLES TOLL ROAD (Portions Toll)
 * Take the VA-657 Exit (Exit Number 10 towards Herndon / Chantilly)
 * Take the ramp toward CHANTILLY
 * Turn Left onto CENTERVILLE ROAD (at end of ramp)
 * Turn Left onto WOODLAND PARK ROAD (less than 1⁄2 mile)
 * End at 13200 WOODLAND PARK ROAD

If you plan to attend via Webinar:

You can attend through OWASPNoVA WebEx

Schedule
Meetings are held the first thursday of the month.

Next Meeting
DATE: Thursday, February 11th, 6pm Eastern Daylight Time LOCATION: 13200 Woodland Park Road Herndon, VA 20171 SPEAKER': Tony Gottlieb TOPIC: the Square Method

During the February Chapter meeting we'll announce the initial program committee, and work towards curriculums.

A suggestion was made last time for &lt; 5 minute "mini-talk" bursts for people who have done something cool. If you're interested, we'll try this out by doing two... please email me privately if interested.

ABSTRACT: - Security requirements have long ranged between:

"Make it secure" and "Use 256b encryption". Do either of those help us build secure software? Tony Gottlieb, currently with Booz Allen Hamilton, will present Nancy Mead's Square method for requirements analysis.

I implore each of you to bring positive and negative examples of security requirements with you. Tony is going to talk about authentication a bit, and it would be wonderful to discuss how you've been successful in making actionable requirements out dribble in that same topic-space.

Please RSVP with Stan as per the usual,

Past meetings
DATE: Thursday, September 17, 2009. 6:00pm Eastern Daylight Time LOCATION: 22260 Pacific blvd, Sterling, VA. 20166 TOPIC: "Fortify 360" SPEAKER: Erik Klein (Fortify Software), Eric Dalci (Cigital)

INSTRUCTIONS: RSVP through [mailto:wade.woolwine@owasp.org?Subject=OWASP%20RSVP Wade Woodline] with “OWASP RSVP” in the subject.

DESCRIPTION: We're pleased to invite you to our next week's OWASP Session (Thursday September 17th). We will be hosting a presentation, demo and hands on session of Fortify 360 (http://www.fortify.com). Fortify 360 includes Fortify SCA (Source Code Analyzer) and the Fortify 360 Server which is Fortify's solution for an enterprise deployment of SCA. The session will start with a presentation by Fortify engineers, followed by a demo and finally a hands on session where the audience will be free to install Fortify SCA on the machine and try it the SCA tool on a sample application that we will provide. The audience will also be introduced with the Fortify 360 Server and try some of the enterprise level features such as collaborative code review, metrics and so on. Bring your laptop if you want to try Fortify 360! The target audience is anyone interested in Secure Code Review with a Static Analysis tool at the desktop level and/or enterprise level. We will need to register visitors before hand...please email wade.woolwine@owasp.org for registration and confirm attendance. Pizza and refreshments will be served.

DATE: Thursday, September 3, 2009. 6:00pm. LOCATION: 13200 Woodland Park Road Herndon, VA 20171 TOPIC: "Conducting Application Assessment" SPEAKER: Jeremy Epstein, SRI

INSTRUCTIONS: RSVP through [mailto:wisseman_stan@bah.com?Subject=OWASP%20RSVP Stan Wisseman] with “OWASP RSVP” in the subject.

DESCRIPTION: After the 2000 election, many states launched headlong into electronic voting systems to avoid the problems with "hanging chads". Once problems with those systems started appearing, many localities started moving to optical scan, which was used by a majority of US voters in the 2008 election. There are other technologies in use around the country, including lever machines, vote-by-mail, vote-by-phone, and Internet voting. What are the tradeoffs among these technologies? Particularly relevant to OWASP, what are the security issues associated with different types of equipment, and what measures do vendors of voting equipment use to try to address the security problems? Are software security problems important, or can non-technical measures protect against them? In this talk, we'll discuss a wide variety of voting technologies, and their pros and cons from both a technical and societal perspective.

ABOUT THE SPEAKER: Jeremy Epstein is Senior Computer Scientist at SRI International. His background includes more than 20 years experience in computer security research, product development, and consulting. Prior to joining SRI International, he was Principal Consultant with Cigital, and before that spent nine years as Senior Director of Product Security at Software AG, an international business software company. Within the area of voting systems, Jeremy has been involved for over five years in voting technology and advocacy, both as an employee and as an independent consultant.

Upcoming Speakers
If you want to present, please contact John. We're very open to hearing from all our members. Future speakers to include Gunnar Peterson and more.

View the OWASP NoVA Chapter Calendar

Static Analysis Curriculum

 * For an introduction to the OWASP Static Analysis (SA) Track goals, objectives, and session roadmap, please see this presentation.

The following is the agenda of the OWASP Static Analysis track roadmap for the Northern Virginia Chapter.



Contacts
Questions related to this curriculum should be sent to [mailto:John.Steven@owasp.org John Steven], who is the Northern Virginia chapter leader.

Registration
Classroom’s size estimate for hands on: 30 stations max. Physical number of students can be larger as people may want to pair up. But we may have a hard limit of 40 students.

Registration for sessions will be on first come and first served basis. REGISTRATION IS OPEN!

Please send an email to [mailto:John.Steven@owasp.org John Steven] with your skill level with Statis Analysis tools, your motivation and the dates that you want to sign in for. Students are required to bring their own laptop. We ask to the students to bring their laptop in the hands on session, and to have software such as SSH pre-installed. Basic knowledge about code is also required in all sessions, except the last one.

Student’s prerequisites
All students will need to bring their own laptop

July 9th 6pm-9pm EST LOCATION: 13200 Woodland Park Road Herndon, VA 20171 TOPIC: "Ounce's 02" SPEAKER(S): Dinis Cruz, OWASP, Ounce Labs. PANEL: TBD INSTRUCTIONS: RSVP through Stan Wisseman wisseman_stan@bah.com with “OWASP RSVP” in the subject.

DESCRIPTION: So what is O2?

Well in my mind O2 is a combination of advanced tools (Technology) which are designed to be used on a particular way (Process) by knowledgeable Individuals (People)

Think about it as a Fighter Jet who is able to go very fast, has tons of controls, needs to be piloted by somebody who knows what they are doing and needs to have a purpose (i.e. mission).

Basically what I did with O2 was to automate the workflow that I have when I'm engaged on a source-code security review.

Now, here is the catch, this version is NOT for the faint-of-heart. I designed this to suit my needs, which although are the same as most other security consultants, have its own particularities :)

The whole model of O2 development is based around the concept of automating a security consultant’s brain, so I basically ensure that the main O2 Developer (Dinis Cruz) has a very good understanding of the feature requirements of the targeted Security Consultant (Dinis Cruz) :) . And this proved (even to my surprise) spectacularly productive, since suddenly I (i.e. the security consultant) didn't had to wait months for new features to be added to its toolkit. If there was something that needed to be added, it would just be added in days or hours.


 * View the OWASP NoVA Chapter Calendar


 * The next meeting is Thursday, July 9th, 2009.
 * Add July 9th to my Google Calendar, Exchange Calendar

Knowledge
The Northern Virginia (NoVA) chapter is committed to compiling resources on interesting and valuable topic areas. We hope that this structure helps you access information pertinent to your tasks at hand as you move through a secure application development life cycle. Currently, our topic areas of focus include activities such as:


 * Threat Modeling
 * Code Review and Static Analysis with tools
 * Penetration Testing and Dynamic Analysis tools
 * Monitoring/Dynamic patching (WAFs)

Certain projects our members are involved in cross-cut these activities, providing value throughout. They include:


 * ASVS

Contributors and Sponsors
Chapter Leader


 * [mailto:John.Steven@owasp.org John Steven], with assistance from [mailto:paco@cigital.com Paco Hope]

Refreshment Sponsors



Facility Sponsors



Northern Virginia

June 2009
Gary McGraw, Cigital Inc.:Building Security In Maturity Model Later, an interview: Jim Routh, formerly of DTCC:''The Economic Advantages of a Resilient Supply Chain- Software Security ''<BR>

Gary McGraw talked about the experience he, Sammy Migues, and Brian Chess gained conducting a survey of some of America's top Software Security groups. Study results are available under the Creative Commons Share Alike license at www.bsi-mm.com. Gary described the common structural elements and activities of successful software security programs, present the maturity model that resulted from survey data, and discuss lessons learned from listening to those leading these groups.

Jim Routh gave an incredibly insightful interview regarding his own experiences crafting their security group.

Download presentation notes at: The Economic Advantages of a Resilient Supply Chain- Software Security

May 2009
Eric Dalci, Cigital Inc.:Introduction to Static Analysis<BR> Later, a panel: <UL> <LI>Steven Lavenhar, Booz Allen Hamilton; <LI>Eric Dalci, Cigital Inc. </UL> Panel moderated by John Steven <BR>

This session is an introductory to Static Analysis. This session presents the different types of analysis used by today's Static Analysis tools. Examples of direct application to find vulnerabilities will be shown (ex: Data Flow Analysis, Semantic, Control Flow, etc.). Current limitations of Static Analysis will also be exposed. This session is tool agnostic, but will cover the approach taken by various leading commercial (as well as open-source) tools.

Download: Intro to Static Analysis

April 2009
Jeremiah Grossman, Whitehat Security: Top 10 Web Hacking Techniques 2008 Jeremiah Spoke on (what he and colleagues determined were the) top ten web hacking techniques of 2008. This talk was a preview of his RSA '09 talk.

Download http://www.whitehatsec.com/home/assets/presentations/09PPT/PPT_OWASPNoVA04082008.pdf

Later, <UL> <LI>Nate Miller, Stratum Security; <LI>Jeremiah Grossman, Whitehat Security; <LI>Tom Brennan, Whitehat Security; and <LI>Wade Woolwine, AOL </UL> served as penetration testing panels answering questions posed and moderated by Ken Van Wyk.

February 2009
Ryan C. Barnett, Breach Security: Patching Challenge: Securing WebGoat with ModSecurity

Identification of web application vulnerabilities is only half the battle with remediation efforts as the other. Let's face the facts, there are many real world business scenarios where it is not possible to update web application code in either a timely manner or at all. This is where the tactical use-case of implementing a web application firewall to address identified issues proves its worth.

This talk will provide an overview of the recommended practices for utilizing a web application firewall for virtual patching. After discussing the framework to use, we will then present a very interesting OWASP Summer of Code Project where the challenge was to attempt to mitigate as many of the OWASP WebGoat vulnerabilities as possible using the open source ModSecurity web application firewall. During the talk, we will discuss both WebGoat and ModSecurity and provide in-depth walk-throughs of some of the complex fixes. Examples will include addressing not only attacks but the underlying vulnerabilities, using data persistence for multiple-step processes, content injection and even examples of the new LUA programming language API. The goal of this talk is to both highlight cutting edge mitigation options using a web application firewall and to show how it can effectively be used by security consultants who traditionally could only offer source code fixes.

Ryan C. Barnett is the Director of Application Security Research at Breach Security and leads Breach Security Labs. He is also a Faculty Member for the SANS Institute, Team Lead for the Center for Internet Security Apache Benchmark Project and a Member of the Web Application Security Consortium where he leads the Distributed Open Proxy Honeypot Project. Mr. Barnett has also authored a web security book for Addison/Wesley Publishing entitled "Preventing Web Attacks with Apache."

(This talk is a preview of Ryan's talk at Blackhat Federal the following week - see https://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-dc-09/bh-dc-09-speakers.html#Barnett )

Download [[Media:Virtual_Patching_Ryan_Barnett_Blackhat_Federal_09.zip| WAF Virtual Patching Challenge: Securing WebGoat with ModSecurity]]

John Steven, Cigital: Moving Beyond Top N Lists

Download [[Media:Moving_Beyond_Top_N_Lists.ppt.zip| Moving Beyond Top N Lists]]

Cigital published an article: The Top 11 Reasons Why Top 10 (or 25) Lists Don’t Work. Yet, these lists are a staple of conference abstracts, industry best practice lists, and the like. Are they good or bad? We’ll explore how to get beyond the Top 10 (or 25) list in making your software security effort real.

John is Senior Director, Advanced Technology Consulting at Cigital. His experience includes research in static code analysis and hands-on architecture and implementation of high-performance, scalable Java EE systems. John has provided security consulting services to a broad variety of commercial clients including two of the largest trading platforms in the world and has advised America's largest internet provider in the Midwest on security and forensics. John led the development of Cigital's architectural analysis methodology and its approach to deploying enterprise software security frameworks. He has demonstrated success in building Cigital's intellectual property for providing cutting-edge security. He brings this experience and a track record of effective strategic innovation to clients seeking to change, whether to adopt more cutting-edge approaches, or to solidify ROI. John currently chairs the SD Best Practices security track and co-edits the building security in department of IEEE's Security and Privacy magazine. John has served on numerous conference panels regarding software security, wireless security and Java EE system development. He holds a B.S. in Computer Engineering and an M.S. in Computer Science from Case Western Reserve University.

January 2009
To kick off 2009, our January meeting featured a discussion of the relationship between application security and CMMI, and an overview of the OWASP ASVS project.

Michele Moss, Booz Allen Hamilton: Evolutions In The Relationship Between Application Security And The CMMI Addressing new and complex threats and IT security challenges requires repeatable, reliable, rapid, and cost effective solutions. To implement these solutions, organizations have begun to align their security improvement efforts with their system and software development practices. During a “Birds of a Feather” at the March 2007 SEPG, a group of industry representatives initiated an effort which led to the definition of assurance practices that can be applied in the context of the CMMI. This presentation will provide an understanding how applying the assurance practices in the context of security contribute to the overall increased quality of products and services, illustrate how the a focus on assurance in the context of CMMI practices is related to application security practices, and present and approach to evaluate and improve the repeatability and reliability of assurance practices. Michele Moss, CISSP, is a security engineer with more than 12 years of experience in process improvement. She specializes in integrating assurance processes and practices into project lifecycles. Michele is the Co-Chair of the DHS Software Assurance Working Group on Processes & Practices. She has assisted numerous organizations with maturing their information technology, information assurance, project management, and support practices through the use of the capability maturity models including the CMMI, and the SSE-CMM. She is one of the key contributors in an effort to apply an assurance focus to CMMI.

Slides available: []

Mike Boberski, Booz Allen Hamilton: About OWASP ASVS

The primary aim of the OWASP ASVS Project is to normalize the range of coverage and level of rigor available in the market when it comes to performing application-level security verification. The goal is to create a set of commercially-workable open standards that are tailored to specific web-based technologies.

Mike Boberski works at Booz Allen Hamilton. He has a background in application security and the use of cryptography by applications. He is experienced in trusted product evaluation, security-related software development and integration, and cryptomodule testing. For OWASP, he is the project lead and a co-author of the OWASP Application Security Verification Standard, the first OWASP standard.

Slides available: []

November 2008
For our November 2008 meeting, we had two great presentations on software assurance and security testing.

Nadya Bartol, Booz Allen Hamilton: Framework for Software Assurance

Nadya's presentation will provide an update on the Software Assurance Forum efforts to establish a comprehensive framework for software assurance (SwA) and security measurement. The Framework addresses measuring achievement of SwA goals and objectives within the context of individual projects, programs, or enterprises. It targets a variety of audiences including executives, developers, vendors, suppliers, and buyers. The Framework leverages existing measurement methodologies, including Practical Software and System Measurement (PSM); CMMI Goal, Question, Indicator, Measure (GQ(I)M); NIST SP 800-55 Rev1; and ISO/IEC 27004 and identifies commonalities among the methodologies to help organizations integrate SwA measurement in their overall measurement efforts cost-effectively and as seamlessly as possible, rather than establish a standalone SwA measurement effort within an organization. The presentation will provide an update on the SwA Forum Measurement Working Group work, present the current version of the Framework and underlying measures development and implementation processes, and propose example SwA measures applicable to a variety of SwA stakeholders. The presentation will update the group on the latest NIST and ISO standards on information security measurement that are being integrated into the Framework as the standards are being developed.

Slides available: []

Paco Hope, Cigital: The Web Security Testing Cookbook

The Web Security Testing Cookbook (O'Reilly & Associates, October 2008) gives developers and testers the tools they need to make security testing a regular part of their development lifecycle. Its recipe style approach covers manual, exploratory testing as well automated techniques that you can make part of your unit tests or regression cycle. The recipes cover the basics like observing messages between clients and servers, to multi-phase tests that script the login and execution of web application features. This book complements many of the security texts in the market that tell you what a vulnerability is, but not how to systematically test it day in and day out. Leverage the recipes in this book to add significant security coverage to your testing without adding significant time and cost to your effort.

Congratulations to Tim Bond who won an autographed copy of Paco's book. Get your copy here []

Slides available: []

October 2008
For our October 2008 meeting, we had two fascinating talks relating to forensics.

Dave Merkel, Mandiant: Enterprise Grade Incident Management - Responding to Persistent Threats

Dave Merkel is Vice President of Products at Mandiant, a leading provider of information security services, education and products. Mr. Merkel has worked in the information security and incident response industry for over 10 years. His background includes service as a federal agent in the US Air Force and over 7 years experience directing security operations at America Online. He currently oversees the product business at Mandiant, and is in charge of building Mandiant Intelligent Response - an enterprise incident response solution. But no, he won't be selling you anything today.

Slides available: []

Inno Eroraha, NetSecurity: [Responding to the Digital Crime Scene: Gathering Volatile Data

Inno Eroraha is the founder and chief strategist of NetSecurity Corporation, a company that provides digital forensics, hands-on security consulting, and Hands-on How-To® training solutions that are high-quality, timely, and customer-focused. In this role, Mr. Eroraha helps clients plan, formulate, and execute the best security and forensics strategy that aligns with their business goals and priorities. He has consulted with Fortune 500 companies, IRS, DHS, VA, DoD, and other entities.

Slides available: [ ]

Knowledge
On the Knowledge page, you'll find links to this chapter's contributions organized by topic area.