Testing for Weak SSL/TLS Ciphers, Insufficient Transport Layer Protection (OTG-CRYPST-001)

Brief Summary
Due to the historical exporting restrictions of high grade cryptography, both legacy and new web servers could be able to handle a weak cipher suite. Even if high grade ciphers are today supported and normally used, some misconfiguration in server installation could be used to force the use of a weak cipher (or at worst no encryption) permitting to an attacker to gain access to the supposed secure communication channel.

Description of the Issue
The HTTP clear-text protocol is normally secured via an SSL or TLS tunnel, resulting in HTTPS traffic. In addition to providing encryption of data in transit, HTTPS allows the identification of servers (and, optionally, of clients) by means of digital certificates.

Weak SSL/TSL Ciphers
Historically, there have been limitations set in place by the U.S. government to allow cryptosystems to be exported only for key sizes of at most 40 bits, a key length which could be broken and would allow the decryption of communications. Since then cryptographic export regulations have been relaxed (though some constraints still hold), however it is important to check the SSL configuration being used to avoid putting in place cryptographic support which could be easily defeated. To reach this goal SSL-based services should not offer the possibility to choose weak cipher suite. A cipher suite is specified by an encryption protocol (DES, RC4, AES), the encryption key length (such as 40, 56, or 128 bits), and a hash algorithm (SHA, MD5) used for integrity checking. Briefly, the key points for the cipher suite determination are the following: It is possible (for example, by means of configuration directives) to specify which cipher suites the server will honor. In this way you may control, for example, whether or not conversations with clients will support 40-bit encryption only.
 * 1) The client sends to the server a ClientHello message specifying, among other information, the protocol and the cipher suites that it is able to handle. Note that a client is usually a web browser (most popular SSL client nowadays), but not necessarily, since it can be any SSL-enabled application; the same holds for the server, which needs not to be a web server, though this is the most common case. (For example, a noteworthy class of SSL clients is that of SSL proxies such as stunnel (www.stunnel.org) which can be used to allow non-SSL enabled tools to talk to SSL services);
 * 2) The server responds with a ServerHello message, containing the chosen protocol and cipher suite that will be used for that session (in general the server selects the strongest protocol and cipher suite supported by both the client and server).

SSL certificate validity – client and server
When accessing a web application via the HTTPS protocol, a secure channel is established between the client and the server. The identity of one (the server) or both parties (client and server) is then established by means of digital certificates. So, once the cipher suite is determined, the “SSL Handshake” continues with the exchange of the certificates, like follow:  The server sends its Certificate message and, if client authentication is required, also sends a CertificateRequest message to the client.  The server sends a ServerHelloDone message and waits for a client response.  Upon receipt of the ServerHelloDone message, the client verifies the validity of the server's digital certificate.  In order for the communication to be set up, a number of checks on the certificates must be passed. While discussing SSL and certificate based authentication is beyond the scope of this Guide, we will focus on the main criteria involved in ascertaining certificate validity: a) checking if the Certificate Authority (CA) is a known one (meaning one considered trusted); b) checking that the certificate is currently valid; c) checking that the name of the site and the name reported in the certificate match. Let’s examine each check more in detail. a) Each browser comes with a preloaded list of trusted CAs, against which the certificate signing CA is compared (this list can be customized and expanded at will). During the initial negotiations with an HTTPS server, if the server certificate relates to a CA unknown to the browser, a warning is usually raised. This happens most often because a web application relies on a certificate signed by a self-established CA. Whether this is to be considered a concern depends on several factors. For example, this may be fine for an Intranet environment (think of corporate web email being provided via HTTPS; here, obviously all users recognize the internal CA as a trusted CA). When a service is provided to the general public via the Internet, however (i.e. when it is important to positively verify the identity of the server we are talking to), it is usually imperative to rely on a trusted CA, one which is recognized by all the user base (and here we stop with our considerations; we won’t delve deeper in the implications of the trust model being used by digital certificates). b) Certificates have an associated period of validity, therefore they may expire. Again, we are warned by the browser about this. A public service needs a temporally valid certificate; otherwise, it means we are talking with a server whose certificate was issued by someone we trust, but has expired without being renewed. c) What if the name on the certificate and the name of the server do not match? If this happens, it might sound suspicious. For a number of reasons, this is not so rare to see. A system may host a number of name-based virtual hosts, which share the same IP address and are identified by means of the HTTP 1.1 Host: header information. In this case, since the SSL handshake checks the server certificate before the HTTP request is processed, it is not possible to assign different certificates to each virtual server. Therefore, if the name of the site and the name reported in the certificate do not match, we have a condition which is typically signaled by the browser. To avoid this, IP-based virtual servers must be used. [2] and [3] describe techniques to deal with this problem and allow name-based virtual hosts to be correctly referenced.

Other vulnerabilities
Moreover, also in the case in which weak cipher suites are not supported by the server, there are others vulnerabilities that could lead an attacker to force a victim into using a non-secure channel instead of a secure one. These vulnerabilities, like SSL Strip attack and Surf Jacking, are possible due to the use, by the server, of both the HTTP and HTTPS protocols to provide the website contents.

Testing for Weak SSL/TSL Ciphers vulnerabilities
Large number of available cipher suites and quick progress in cryptanalysis makes judging a SSL server a non-trivial task. These criteria are widely recognized as minimum checklist: While there are known collision attacks on MD5 and known crypto-analytical attacks on RC4, their specific usage in SSL and TLS doesn't allow these attacks to be practical and SSLv3 or TLSv1 cipher suites using RC4 and MD5 with key length of 128 bit is still considered sufficient. The following standards can be used as reference while assessing SSL servers: SSL Server Database can be used to assess configuration of publicly available SSL servers based on SSL Rating Guide[5]. In order to detect possible support of weak ciphers, the ports associated to SSL/TLS wrapped services must be identified. These typically include port 443, which is the standard https port; however, this may change because a) https services may be configured to run on non-standard ports, and b) there may be additional SSL/TLS wrapped services related to the web application. In general, a service discovery is required to identify such ports. The nmap scanner, via the “–sV” scan option, is able to identify SSL services. Vulnerability Scanners, in addition to performing service discovery, may include checks against weak ciphers (for example, the Nessus scanner has the capability of checking SSL services on arbitrary ports, and will report weak ciphers).
 * SSLv2, due to known weaknesses in protocol design
 * Export (EXP) level cipher suites in SSLv3
 * Cipher suites with symmetric encryption algorithm smaller than 128 bits
 * X.509 certificates with RSA or DSA key smaller than 1024 bits
 * X.509 certificates signed using MD5 hash, due to known collision attacks on this hash
 * TLS Renegotiation vulnerability
 * NIST SP 800-52 recommends U.S. federal systems to use at least TLS 1.0 with ciphersuites based on RSA or DSA key agreement with ephemeral Diffie-Hellman, 3DES or AES for confidentality and SHA1 for integrity protection. NIST SP 800-52 specifically disallows non-FIPS compliant algorithms like RC4 and MD5. An exception is U.S. federal systems making connections to outside servers, where these algorithms can be used in SSL client mode.
 * PCI-DSS v2.0 in point 4.1 requires compliant parties to use "strong cryptography" without precisely defining key lengths and algorithms. Common interpretation, partially based on previous versions of the standard, is that at least 128 bit key cipher, no export strength algorithms and no SSLv2 should be used.
 * SSL Server Rating Guide has been proposed to standardize SSL server assessment and currently is in draft version.

''' Example 1. ''' SSL service recognition via nmap. [root@test]# nmap -F -sV localhost

Starting nmap 3.75 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2005-07-27 14:41 CEST Interesting ports on localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1): (The 1205 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed)

PORT     STATE SERVICE         VERSION 443/tcp  open  ssl             OpenSSL 901/tcp  open  http            Samba SWAT administration server 8080/tcp open  http            Apache httpd 2.0.54 ((Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.54 OpenSSL/0.9.7g PHP/4.3.11) 8081/tcp open  http            Apache Tomcat/Coyote JSP engine 1.0

Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 27.881 seconds [root@test]#

''' Example 2. ''' Identifying weak ciphers with Nessus. The following is an anonymized excerpt of a report generated by the Nessus scanner, corresponding to the identification of a server certificate allowing weak ciphers (see underlined text).

https (443/tcp) Description Here is the SSLv2 server certificate: Certificate: Data: Version: 3 (0x2) Serial Number: 1 (0x1) Signature Algorithm: md5WithRSAEncryption Issuer: C=**, ST=******, L=******, O=******, OU=******, CN=****** Validity Not Before: Oct 17 07:12:16 2002 GMT Not After : Oct 16 07:12:16 2004 GMT Subject: C=**, ST=******, L=******, O=******, CN=****** Subject Public Key Info: Public Key Algorithm: rsaEncryption RSA Public Key: (1024 bit) Modulus (1024 bit): 00:98:4f:24:16:cb:0f:74:e8:9c:55:ce:62:14:4e: 6b:84:c5:81:43:59:c1:2e:ac:ba:af:92:51:f3:0b: ad:e1:4b:22:ba:5a:9a:1e:0f:0b:fb:3d:5d:e6:fc: ef:b8:8c:dc:78:28:97:8b:f0:1f:17:9f:69:3f:0e: 72:51:24:1b:9c:3d:85:52:1d:df:da:5a:b8:2e:d2: 09:00:76:24:43:bc:08:67:6b:dd:6b:e9:d2:f5:67: e1:90:2a:b4:3b:b4:3c:b3:71:4e:88:08:74:b9:a8: 2d:c4:8c:65:93:08:e6:2f:fd:e0:fa:dc:6d:d7:a2: 3d:0a:75:26:cf:dc:47:74:29 Exponent: 65537 (0x10001) X509v3 extensions: X509v3 Basic Constraints: CA:FALSE Netscape Comment: OpenSSL Generated Certificate Page 10 Network Vulnerability Assessment Report 25.05.2005 X509v3 Subject Key Identifier: 10:00:38:4C:45:F0:7C:E4:C6:A7:A4:E2:C9:F0:E4:2B:A8:F9:63:A8 X509v3 Authority Key Identifier: keyid:CE:E5:F9:41:7B:D9:0E:5E:5D:DF:5E:B9:F3:E6:4A:12:19:02:76:CE DirName:/C=**/ST=******/L=******/O=******/OU=******/CN=****** serial:00 Signature Algorithm: md5WithRSAEncryption 7b:14:bd:c7:3c:0c:01:8d:69:91:95:46:5c:e6:1e:25:9b:aa: 8b:f5:0d:de:e3:2e:82:1e:68:be:97:3b:39:4a:83:ae:fd:15: 2e:50:c8:a7:16:6e:c9:4e:76:cc:fd:69:ae:4f:12:b8:e7:01: b6:58:7e:39:d1:fa:8d:49:bd:ff:6b:a8:dd:ae:83:ed:bc:b2: 40:e3:a5:e0:fd:ae:3f:57:4d:ec:f3:21:34:b1:84:97:06:6f: f4:7d:f4:1c:84:cc:bb:1c:1c:e7:7a:7d:2d:e9:49:60:93:12: 0d:9f:05:8c:8e:f9:cf:e8:9f:fc:15:c0:6e:e2:fe:e5:07:81: 82:fc Here is the list of available SSLv2 ciphers: RC4-MD5 EXP-RC4-MD5 RC2-CBC-MD5 EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 DES-CBC-MD5 DES-CBC3-MD5 RC4-64-MD5 The SSLv2 server offers 5 strong ciphers, but also 0 medium strength and 2 weak "export class" ciphers. The weak/medium ciphers may be chosen by an export-grade or badly configured client software. They only offer a limited protection against a brute force attack Solution: disable those ciphers and upgrade your client software if necessary. See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kben-us216482 or http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_ssl.html#sslciphersuite This SSLv2 server also accepts SSLv3 connections. This SSLv2 server also accepts TLSv1 connections. Vulnerable hosts (list of vulnerable hosts follows)

''' Example 3. ''' Manually audit weak SSL cipher levels with OpenSSL. The following will attempt to connect to Google.com with SSLv2.

[root@test]# openssl s_client -no_tls1 -no_ssl3 -connect www.google.com:443 CONNECTED(00000003) depth=0 /C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=www.google.com verify error:num=20:unable to get local issuer certificate verify return:1 depth=0 /C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=www.google.com verify error:num=27:certificate not trusted verify return:1 depth=0 /C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=www.google.com verify error:num=21:unable to verify the first certificate verify return:1 --- Server certificate -BEGIN CERTIFICATE- MIIDYzCCAsygAwIBAgIQYFbAC3yUC8RFj9MS7lfBkzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADCB zjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJ Q2FwZSBUb3duMR0wGwYDVQQKExRUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyBjYzEoMCYGA1UE CxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEhMB8GA1UEAxMYVGhh d3RlIFByZW1pdW0gU2VydmVyIENBMSgwJgYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhlwcmVtaXVtLXNl cnZlckB0aGF3dGUuY29tMB4XDTA2MDQyMTAxMDc0NVoXDTA3MDQyMTAxMDc0NVow aDELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxEzARBgNVBAgTCkNhbGlmb3JuaWExFjAUBgNVBAcTDU1v dW50YWluIFZpZXcxEzARBgNVBAoTCkdvb2dsZSBJbmMxFzAVBgNVBAMTDnd3dy5n b29nbGUuY29tMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC/e2Vs8U33fRDk 5NNpNgkB1zKw4rqTozmfwty7eTEI8PVH1Bf6nthocQ9d9SgJAI2WOBP4grPj7MqO dXMTFWGDfiTnwes16G7NZlyh6peT68r7ifrwSsVLisJp6pUf31M5Z3D88b+Yy4PE D7BJaTxq6NNmP1vYUJeXsGSGrV6FUQIDAQABo4GmMIGjMB0GA1UdJQQWMBQGCCsG AQUFBwMBBggrBgEFBQcDAjBABgNVHR8EOTA3MDWgM6Axhi9odHRwOi8vY3JsLnRo YXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUHJlbWl1bVNlcnZlckNBLmNybDAyBggrBgEFBQcBAQQm MCQwIgYIKwYBBQUHMAGGFmh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20wDAYDVR0TAQH/ BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQADlTbBdVY6LD1nHWkhTadmzuWq2rWE0KO3 Ay+7EleYWPOo+EST315QLpU6pQgblgobGoI5x/fUg2U8WiYj1I1cbavhX2h1hda3 FJWnB3SiXaiuDTsGxQ267EwCVWD5bCrSWa64ilSJTgiUmzAv0a2W8YHXdG08+nYc X/dVk5WRTw== -END CERTIFICATE- subject=/C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=www.google.com issuer=/C=ZA/ST=Western Cape/L=Cape Town/O=Thawte Consulting cc/OU=Certification Services Division/CN=Thawte Premium Server CA/emailAddress=premium-server@thawte.com --- No client certificate CA names sent --- Ciphers common between both SSL endpoints: RC4-MD5        EXP-RC4-MD5     RC2-CBC-MD5 EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 DES-CBC-MD5    DES-CBC3-MD5 RC4-64-MD5 --- SSL handshake has read 1023 bytes and written 333 bytes --- New, SSLv2, Cipher is DES-CBC3-MD5 Server public key is 1024 bit Compression: NONE Expansion: NONE SSL-Session: Protocol : SSLv2 Cipher   : DES-CBC3-MD5 Session-ID: 709F48E4D567C70A2E49886E4C697CDE Session-ID-ctx: Master-Key: 649E68F8CF936E69642286AC40A80F433602E3C36FD288C3 Key-Arg  : E8CB6FEB9ECF3033 Start Time: 1156977226 Timeout  : 300 (sec) Verify return code: 21 (unable to verify the first certificate) --- closed

''' Example 4. ''' Testing supported protocols and ciphers using SSLScan. SSLScan is a free command line tool that scans a HTTPS service to enumerate what protocols (supports SSLv2, SSLv3 and TLS1) and what ciphers the HTTPS service supports. It runs both on Linux and Windows OS (OSX not tested) and is released under an open source license.

[user@test]$ ./SSLScan --no-failed mail.google.com _          ___ ___| |___  ___ __ _ _ __          / __/ __| / __|/ __/ _` | '_ \          \__ \__ \ \__ \ (_| (_| | | | |          |___/___/_|___/\___\__,_|_| |_|

Version 1.9.0-win http://www.titania.co.uk Copyright 2010 Ian Ventura-Whiting / Michael Boman Compiled against OpenSSL 0.9.8n 24 Mar 2010

Testing SSL server mail.google.com on port 443

Supported Server Cipher(s): accepted SSLv3  256 bits  AES256-SHA accepted SSLv3  128 bits  AES128-SHA accepted SSLv3  168 bits  DES-CBC3-SHA accepted SSLv3  128 bits  RC4-SHA accepted SSLv3  128 bits  RC4-MD5 accepted TLSv1  256 bits  AES256-SHA accepted TLSv1  128 bits  AES128-SHA accepted TLSv1  168 bits  DES-CBC3-SHA accepted TLSv1  128 bits  RC4-SHA accepted TLSv1  128 bits  RC4-MD5

Prefered Server Cipher(s): SSLv3 128 bits  RC4-SHA TLSv1 128 bits  RC4-SHA

SSL Certificate: Version: 2 Serial Number: -4294967295 Signature Algorithm: sha1WithRSAEncryption Issuer: /C=ZA/O=Thawte Consulting (Pty) Ltd./CN=Thawte SGC CA   Not valid before: Dec 18 00:00:00 2009 GMT Not valid after: Dec 18 23:59:59 2011 GMT Subject: /C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=mail.google.com Public Key Algorithm: rsaEncryption RSA Public Key: (1024 bit) Modulus (1024 bit): 00:d9:27:c8:11:f2:7b:e4:45:c9:46:b6:63:75:83: b1:77:7e:17:41:89:80:38:f1:45:27:a0:3c:d9:e8: a8:00:4b:d9:07:d0:ba:de:ed:f4:2c:a6:ac:dc:27: 13:ec:0c:c1:a6:99:17:42:e6:8d:27:d2:81:14:b0: 4b:82:fa:b2:c5:d0:bb:20:59:62:28:a3:96:b5:61: f6:76:c1:6d:46:d2:fd:ba:c6:0f:3d:d1:c9:77:9a: 58:33:f6:06:76:32:ad:51:5f:29:5f:6e:f8:12:8b: ad:e6:c5:08:39:b3:43:43:a9:5b:91:1d:d7:e3:cf: 51:df:75:59:8e:8d:80:ab:53 Exponent: 65537 (0x10001) X509v3 Extensions: X509v3 Basic Constraints: critical CA:FALSE     X509v3 CRL Distribution Points: URI:http://crl.thawte.com/ThawteSGCCA.crl X509v3 Extended Key Usage: TLS Web Server Authentication, TLS Web Client Authentication, Netscape Server Gated Crypto     Authority Information Access: OCSP - URI:http://ocsp.thawte.com CA Issuers - URI:http://www.thawte.com/repository/Thawte_SGC_CA.crt Verify Certificate: unable to get local issuer certificate

Renegotiation requests supported

''' Example 5. ''' Testing common SSL flaws with ssl_tests ssl_tests (http://www.pentesterscripting.com/discovery/ssl_tests) is a bash script that uses sslscan and openssl to check for various flaws - ssl version 2, weak ciphers, md5withRSAEncryption,SSLv3 Force Ciphering Bug/Renegotiation.

[user@test]$ ./ssl_test.sh 192.168.1.3 443 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ SSL Tests - v2, weak ciphers, MD5, Renegotiation by Aung Khant, http://yehg.net +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

[*] testing on 192.168.1.3:443 ..

[*] tesing for sslv2 .. [*] sslscan 192.168.1.3:443 | grep Accepted SSLv2 Accepted SSLv2  168 bits  DES-CBC3-MD5 Accepted SSLv2  56 bits   DES-CBC-MD5 Accepted SSLv2  40 bits   EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 Accepted SSLv2  128 bits  RC2-CBC-MD5 Accepted SSLv2  40 bits   EXP-RC4-MD5 Accepted SSLv2  128 bits  RC4-MD5

[*] testing for weak ciphers ... [*] sslscan 192.168.1.3:443 | grep 40 bits | grep Accepted Accepted SSLv2  40 bits   EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 Accepted SSLv2  40 bits   EXP-RC4-MD5 Accepted SSLv3  40 bits   EXP-EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA Accepted SSLv3  40 bits   EXP-DES-CBC-SHA Accepted SSLv3  40 bits   EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 Accepted SSLv3  40 bits   EXP-RC4-MD5 Accepted TLSv1  40 bits   EXP-EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA Accepted TLSv1  40 bits   EXP-DES-CBC-SHA Accepted TLSv1  40 bits   EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 Accepted TLSv1  40 bits   EXP-RC4-MD5

[*] sslscan 192.168.1.3:443 | grep 56 bits | grep Accepted Accepted SSLv2  56 bits   DES-CBC-MD5 Accepted SSLv3  56 bits   EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA Accepted SSLv3  56 bits   DES-CBC-SHA Accepted TLSv1  56 bits   EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA Accepted TLSv1  56 bits   DES-CBC-SHA

[*] testing for MD5 certificate .. [*] sslscan 192.168.1.3:443 | grep MD5WithRSAEncryption

[*] testing for SSLv3 Force Ciphering Bug/Renegotiation .. [*] echo R | openssl s_client -connect 192.168.1.3:443 | grep DONE depth=0 /C=DE/ST=Berlin/L=Berlin/O=XAMPP/OU=XAMPP/CN=localhost/emailAddress=admin@localhost verify error:num=18:self signed certificate verify return:1 depth=0 /C=DE/ST=Berlin/L=Berlin/O=XAMPP/OU=XAMPP/CN=localhost/emailAddress=admin@localhost verify return:1 RENEGOTIATING depth=0 /C=DE/ST=Berlin/L=Berlin/O=XAMPP/OU=XAMPP/CN=localhost/emailAddress=admin@localhost verify error:num=18:self signed certificate verify return:1 depth=0 /C=DE/ST=Berlin/L=Berlin/O=XAMPP/OU=XAMPP/CN=localhost/emailAddress=admin@localhost verify return:1 DONE

[*] done

Example 6. Testing common SSL flaws with SSL Server Test SSL Server Test (https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/index.html) is a free online service, provided by Qualys SSL Labs, that performs a deep analysis of the configuration of any SSL web server on the public Internet. It’s a very easy to use but powerful tool. You have only to provide to the tool the URL of the website that you have to test, and the tool returns a lot of information about the protocols and cipher suites support by the server, with details about any flaws found.

Testing SSL certificate validity – client and server
Firstly upgrade your browser because also CA certs expire and, in every release of the browser, these are been renewed. Examine the validity of the certificates used by the application. Browsers will issue a warning when encountering expired certificates, certificates issued by untrusted CAs, and certificates which do not match namewise with the site to which they should refer. By clicking on the padlock which appears in the browser window when visiting an HTTPS site, you can look at information related to the certificate – including the issuer, period of validity, encryption characteristics, etc. If the application requires a client certificate, you probably have installed one to access it. Certificate information is available in the browser by inspecting the relevant certificate(s) in the list of the installed certificates. These checks must be applied to all visible SSL-wrapped communication channels used by the application. Though this is the usual https service running on port 443, there may be additional services involved depending on the web application architecture and on deployment issues (an HTTPS administrative port left open, HTTPS services on non-standard ports, etc.). Therefore, apply these checks to all SSL-wrapped ports which have been discovered. For example, the nmap scanner features a scanning mode (enabled by the –sV command line switch) which identifies SSL-wrapped services. The Nessus vulnerability scanner has the capability of performing SSL checks on all SSL/TLS-wrapped services.

Examples Rather than providing a fictitious example, we have inserted an anonymized real-life example to stress how frequently one stumbles on https sites whose certificates are inaccurate with respect to naming. The following screenshots refer to a regional site of a high-profile IT company. Warning issued by Microsoft Internet Explorer. We are visiting an .it site and the certificate was issued to a .com site! Internet Explorer warns that the name on the certificate does not match the name of the site.



Warning issued by Mozilla Firefox. The message issued by Firefox is different – Firefox complains because it cannot ascertain the identity of the .com site the certificate refers to because it does not know the CA which signed the certificate. In fact, Internet Explorer and Firefox do not come preloaded with the same list of CAs. Therefore, the behavior experienced with various browsers may differ.



Testing for other vulnerabilities
As mentioned previously there are other types of vulnerabilities that are not related with the SSL/TLS protocol used or the cipher suite. These vulnerabilities are possible when the server provide the website both with the HTTP and HTTPS protocols, and permit to an attacker to force a victim into using a non-secure channel instead of a secure one.

Surf Jacking Surf Jackin attack [6] was first presented by Sandro Gauci and permits to an attacker to hijack an HTTP session even when the victim’s connection is encrypted using SSL or TLS. The following is a scenario of how the attack can take place: To test if a website is vulnerable is sufficient to proceed like follow:
 * Victim logs into the secure website at https://somesecuresite/.
 * The secure site issues a session cookie as the client logs in.
 * While logged in, the victim opens a new browser window and goes to http:// examplesite/
 * An attacker sitting on the same network is able to see the clear text traffic to http://examplesite.
 * The attacker sends back a "301 Moved Permanently" in response to the clear text traffic to http://examplesite. The response contains the header “Location: http://somesecuresite /”, which makes it appear that examplesite is sending the web browser to somesecuresite. Notice that the URL scheme is HTTP not HTTPS.
 * The victim's browser starts a new clear text connection to http://somesecuresite/ and sends an HTTP request containing cookie in the HTTP header in clear text
 * The attacker sees this traffic and logs the cookie for later (ab)use.
 * 1) Check if website supports both HTTP and HTTPS protocol
 * 2) Check if cookies do not have the “Secure” flag

Testing for Weak SSL/TSL Ciphers
Check the configuration of the web servers which provide https services. If the web application provides other SSL/TLS wrapped services, these should be checked as well. Example 1: The following registry path in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 and Microsoft Windows Server 2008 defines the ciphers available to the server: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Ciphers\ Example 2:  To check the cipher suites and protocols supported by Apache2 web server open the ssl.conf file and search for the  and   directives.

Testing SSL certificate validity – client and server
Examine the validity of the certificates used by the application at both server and client levels. The usage of certificates is primarily at the web server level; however, there may be additional communication paths protected by SSL (for example, towards the DBMS). You should check the application architecture to identify all SSL protected channels.