Project Information:template SKAVENGER - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F
From OWASP
Clik here to return to the previous page.
| FINAL REVIEW | ||
|---|---|---|
| PART I | ||
|
Project Deliveries & Objectives | ||
| QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
|
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. | Matthias implemented all objectives. The documentation also descivbes how to use WebScarab to analyze a scan. The GUI even contains functionality which wasn't on schedule but is very usefull for daily work (like filtering the results accoding some scores): | |
|
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. | 100% | |
|
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | The community should start implementing "scanner" adapters for other proxies and/or logfiles, for example to support paros. | |
| PART II | ||
|
Assessment Criteria | ||
| QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
|
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? | none | |
|
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? | none | |
|
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? | none | |
|
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | ||
