Project Information:template Code Crawler - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F
From OWASP
Clik here to return to the previous page.
| FINAL REVIEW | ||
|---|---|---|
| PART I | ||
|
Project Deliveries & Objectives | ||
| QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
|
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. | Code Crawler is a stable an easy to use tool | |
|
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. | 100% | |
|
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | Documentation to improve. It should be nice to indicate how many High, Medium and low vulnerabilities the tool has founded. | |
| PART II | ||
|
Assessment Criteria | ||
| QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
|
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? | None. | |
|
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? | None. | |
|
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? | The project seems to be in beta quality. It does a quick code review of .net and java files, but needs more documentations and some improvement from the OWASP Code Review project. | |
|
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | More feedback from the OWASP Community. | |
